Differential Requirement for CD 70 and CD 80 / CD 86 in Dendritic Cell-mediated Activation of Tumor Tolerized CD 8 T Cells
S. Bak,Mike Stein Barnkob,A. Bai,E. Higham,K. Wittrup,Jianzhu Chen
Abstract:A major obstacle to efficacious T cell-based cancer immunotherapy is the tolerizing tumor microenvironment that rapidly inactivates tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In an autochthonous model of prostate cancer, we have previously shown that intratumoral injection of antigen loaded dendritic cells (DCs) delays T cell tolerance induction as well as refunctionalizes already tolerized T cells in the tumor tissue. In this study, we have defined molecular interactions that mediate DCs’ effects. We show that pretreating antigen-loaded DCs with anti-CD70 antibody abolishes DCs’ ability to delay tumor-mediated T cell tolerance induction, whereas interfering with 4-1BBL, CD80, CD86 or both CD80 and CD86 had no significant effect. In contrast, CD80 /or CD80CD86 DCs failed to reactivate already-tolerized T cells in the tumor tissue, whereas interfering with CD70 and 4-1BBL had no effect. Furthermore, despite a high level of PD-1 expression by tumor infiltrating T cells and PD-L1 expression in the prostate, disrupting PD1/PD-L1 interaction did not enhance T cell function in this model. These findings reveal dynamic requirements for costimulatory signals to overcome tumor induced tolerance and have significant implications for developing more effective cancer immunotherapies. Introduction A major focus of cancer immunotherapy has been stimulating patients’ CD8 cytolytic T cells to kill tumor cells. In one treatment modality, tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) are isolated from the patient, activated ex vivo and infused back into the same patient. Such adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown clinical benefit in treating melanoma (1). In another treatment modality, DC based vaccines are used to stimulate the patients’ endogenous anti-tumor immune response, and recently has been approved for treating prostate cancer (2). Despite these successes, a major hurdle to widespread use of these and other treatments utilizing CD8 T cells is the tolerizing environment within the tumor tissue (1), which rapidly inactivates TILs and render the therapies ineffective. T cell activation and function is regulated by both costimulatory and inhibitory signals. In concert with peptide MHC (pMHC) and T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, additional receptors on T cells promote or negate expansion, differentiation, and survival (3). Programmed death-1 (PD1) expressed on activated T cells inhibits T cell function upon engagement with its ligand, PDLigand 1 (PD-L1). PD-L1 is expressed on tumor and/or tumor associated stroma, and sites of immune privilege, and is considered a promising candidate for checkpoint blockade in tumor immunotherapy (4). Indeed, blockade of PD-L1 along with adoptive transfer of tumor specific T cells, delays tumor growth in preclinical melanoma models (5). Among costimulatory molecules, engagement of CD28 on T cells with CD80 and CD86 on antigen presenting cells (APCs) promotes activation of both naïve and memory T cells (3). Specific to anti-tumor responses, enforced expression of CD80 and/or CD86 on tumor cells stimulates their destruction by the immune system (6), a strategy of cancer immunotherapy that has been tested in clinical trials (7). The TNF family contains a diverse array of molecules critical for positively regulating T cell function, including the CD27/CD70 and 4-1BB/4-1BBL receptor ligand pairs, expressed on T cells/APCs, respectively (8). Overexpression of CD70 in transgenic mice enhances priming of T cells, leading to rejection of EL-4 thymomas that express the nucleoprotein (NP) model antigen (9). Similarly, in vivo stimulation of clonotypic T cells with an anti-4-1BB antibody promotes T cell rejection of established murine plasmacytoma tumors (10). In our study of CD8 T cell-tumor cell interaction, we have developed an autochthonous TRP-SIY prostate cancer model, based on TRAMP mice, where tumor cells express a nominal MHC class I epitope (SIYRYYGL or SIY) recognized by the 2C clonotypic TCR (11). Adoptive transfer of naïve CD8 2C T cells into TRP-SIY mice followed by infection with influenza virus expressing the SIY epitope leads to activation and differentiation of transferred T cells into potent effector cells. As in human patients, effector T cells infiltrate into the prostate tumor tissue and rapidly become inactivated (tolerized). The tolerized 2C T cells persist in the prostate tumor tissue (12) expressing high levels of PD-1, analogous to TILs in patients. Importantly, we have found that antigen-loaded bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs), when injected intraprostatically, delay the rapid tolerance induction of effector 2C T cells as they initially infiltrate the tumor tissue (13). In addition, when antigen-loaded BMDCs are injected after initial tolerance induction, they refunctionalize the persisting tolerized 2C T cells in the tumor tissue. These previous studies set the stage to define molecular interactions that are required for prostate tumor-mediated T cell tolerance induction and DC-mediated delay and reactivation of tolerized T cells in the prostate tumor microenvironment. In this study, we have evaluated the role of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in T cell tolerance induction in the prostate tumor tissue and the role of CD80, CD86, 4-1BBL, and CD70 in DCmediated delay of T cell tolerance induction and refunctionalization of tolerized T cells in the prostate tumor tissue. Our results show that despite the high levels of PD-1 expression by prostate-infiltrating T cells and PD-L1 expression in the prostate, blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interaction has no effect on T cell tolerance induction in the prostate tumor tissue. While CD70 is required for DC-mediated delay of T cell tolerance induction, CD80 and CD86 are required for refunctionalizing the tolerized T cells in the prostate tumor tissue. These findings show that different costimulatory signals are required to overcome tumor tolerizing signals during the initial tolerance induction and reactivation of previously tolerized T cells. They also suggest approaches to overcome the tolerizing tumor environment to achieve more efficacious cancer immunotherapy by ACT and DC vaccination. Materials and Methods Mice, Adoptive Transfer and Influenza Infection TRP-SIY mice were generated as previously described (11). 2C TCR transgenic mice were maintained on C57BL/6 and RAG1 backgrounds (2C/RAG mice). CD86, and CD80/CD86 knockout mice on the C57BL/6 background were from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). CD80, PD-L1 knockout and TRAMP mice were bred in house. Where indicated, mice were retroorbitally injected with 1.5x10 naïve 2C cells from 2C/RAG mice and were intranasally infected with 100 pfu WSN-SIY influenza A virus. All experiments were approved by the Committee on Animal Care (CAC) at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Generation of Bone Marrow-Derived DCs (BMDCs) and Intraprostatic Injection Bone marrow was collected from the femurs of C57BL/6 mice, or indicated knockout mice. Cells were resuspended at 2x10 cells/mL in RPMI plus 10%FCS, 50μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 4mM L-glutamine and 100U/mL-100ug/mL penicillin-streptomycin supplemented 1:30 with the supernatant from J5 cells secreting GM-CSF. Cells were washed and media changed on day 2 and 5, 1μg/mL LPS was added on day 6, and cells were harvested on day 7. Where indicated, BMDCs were loaded with 1μg/mL SIY peptide for 1hr at 37°C and/or were labeled for 10 min at 37°C with 5μM CFSE (Invitrogen) in PBS plus 0.1% BSA on the day of harvest. For blocking experiments, 1x10 cell/mL were incubated in 10 μg/mL of F(ab’)2 of indicated antibodies for 2.5 hours on ice, as previously described (14). BMDCs were rinsed and resuspended at 1x10 cells / 40μL PBS for intraprostatic injection (1x10 cells per mouse). Cells and Flow Cytometry Single cell suspensions were prepared from lymphoid tissues by grinding them between frosted glass slides and filtering the suspensions through 70μm nylon mesh. Prostate tissues were digested with 2μg/mL collagenase A (Roche) and 170U/mL DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich) in RPMI 1640 plus 10% FCS for 1hr at 37oC. Digested samples were then ground between frosted glass slides and filtered through 70μm nylon mesh. Intracellular IFN-γ staining was performed with a BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences). Recovered cells were restimulated with 1μg/mL SIY peptide for 4hr at 37°C in the presence of BD GolgiPlug containing brefeldin A. Surface antigens were stained, dead cells were identified using a LIVE/DEAD Fixable Red Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen), and all cells were fixed and permeabilized. Samples were then stained with a PE-conjugated anti-IFN-γ antibody (BD Pharmingen). Gates were set using a panel of fluorescent minus one controls. Statistical analysis was conducted using a Student’s t test and data considered significant if p<0.05. Immunohistochemistry Prostate glands were excised from mice, flash frozen in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek, Sakura, Torrance, CA) and cyrosectioned at 10 μM by the Koch Institute Histology Core Facility. Sections were fixed with acetone and stained with Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Visualization of PD-L1 staining was carried out with 3,3’diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (Vector Laboratories) and counterstained with eosin (SigmaAldrich, St. Louis, MO). Images were acquisitioned using a Zeiss Axioplan II microscope, using Zeiss 25x (0.8) lenses and a QImaging MicroPublisher 5.0 color camera. Images were captured using Openlab 5.5 (Improvision, PerkinElmer), and analyzed using ImageJ (US National Institutes of Health). Antibodies and F(ab’)2 Production Fluorescently labeled Anti-Thy1.1 (Clone OX-7), CD27 (LG.3A10), CD11c (N418), CD28 (37.51), PD1 (RMP1-30), 41BB (17B5), OX40 (OX-86), CD30 (CD30.1), LAG-3 (C9B7W) were from BioLegend, anti-CD86 (P03.1), CD70 (FR70), 4-1BB-L (TKS-1), PD-L1 (MIH5), Tim3 (8B.2C12) from eBioscience, anti-CD80 (16-10A1), CD44 (IM7) and rat IgG2bκ isotype (clone A95-1) from BD Pharmingen, and biotinylated anti-rat Ig