Public Perceptions Of Private Health Care In Socialist China China's burgeoning private health care sector holds both promises and perils

Meng-Kin Lim,Hui Yang,Tuohong Zhang,Wen Feng,Zijun Zhou

2004-01-01

Abstract:We present the findings of a United Nations Development Programme-World Health Organization study commissioned by China's Ministry of Health on use of public and private ambulatory care services in three Chinese provinces. We found much unmet medi- cal need (16 percent), attributed mainly to the perceived high cost of care. Seventy-one per- cent had no health insurance (90 percent in rural and 51 percent in urban areas). For 33 percent, the last consultation was with a private practitioner. Widespread dissatisfaction with public providers (mainly high user fees and poor staff attitudes) is driving patients to seek cheaper but lower-quality care from poorly regulated private providers. C hina's b old m arket r eforms, beginning in the early 1980s and accel- erating through the 1990s, have contributed to unprecedented economic growth (9.3 percent annually from 1978 to 2000), improving the lives of millions of people.1 But they have also affected health care in China in ways that are still not fully understood. One important consequence has been the proliferation of fee-for-service (FFS) private medical practice in a largely unregulated environ- ment. Banned during the Cultural Revolution, private medical practice reemerged in the early 1980s. This was a direct result of the unfortunate dismantling of the Cooperative Medical System (CMS), which during the Maoist era had under- pinned health care financing for the vast majority (70 percent) of China's popula- tion living in the rural communes.2 As collectives were abolished, the CMS became untenable; with CMS coverage gone, most rural clinics and even township hospi- tals became privatized overnight, and peasant families suddenly found themselves having to pay out of pocket for health care services.3 In the cities, meanwhile, existing risk-pooling protection schemes for local gov- ernment and state-owned enterprise employees floundered as health care costs skyrocketed, aggravated by the rapid diffusion of costly medical technologies and a poor understanding of the inflationary impact of market-based medicine. De-