The surgical strategy of cervical dumblbell tumors,

吕扬,姜亮,刘晓光,马庆军,党耕町,刘忠军
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2008.06.005
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To discuss surgical approaches and spine reconstruction of cervical dumbbell tumors.Method:34 patients with cervical dumbbell tumors were studied retrospectively.The pathological diagnosis included schwannoma in 23 cases,neurofibroma 5 cases,neurofibromatosis 1 case,ganglioma 3 cases,malignant schwannoma 2 cases.We divided the cervical transaction into two axes:one was from back to front which were marked from Ⅰ to Ⅴ,the other was along the spinal nerve path from inside to outside which were marked from A to D.Section Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ should be operated via posterior approach,section Ⅳ,Ⅴ via anterior approach,section A via posterior approach,section B and C via anterior,posterior or lateral approach,section D via anterior or lateral approach.According to the sections involved by the tumors,the final approach was confirmed.Result:Twenty patients underwent posterior approach only,6 cases had anterior approach,1 case via lateral approach,and 7 cases had combined anterior and posterior approaches.The tumors were radically resected in all the patients.Nerve roots were resected in 10 cases,and a single vertebral artery was ligated in 2 cases.Average time of follow-up was 55 months,the recurrence of the tumors was observed in 3 cases.Only one was benign tumor,and the other two were malignant.Fixation failure or kyphosis were not detected in 23 patents with internal fixation,5 had kyphosis and 1 had kyphoscoliosis in 10 patients without internal fixation. Conclusion:Confirming the section of cervical dumbbell tumors is benefit to direct the surgical approach. The recurrence of cervical dumbbell tumors would apparently decrease after radical tumor resection,the spinal stability should be reconstructed if necessary.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?