Abstract:Recently, deep learning-based image inpainting methods have made great strides in reconstructing damaged regions. However, these methods often struggle to produce satisfactory results when dealing with missing images with large holes, leading to distortions in the structure and blurring of textures. To address these problems, we combine the advantages of transformers and convolutions to propose an image inpainting method that incorporates edge priors and attention mechanisms. The proposed method aims to improve the results of inpainting large holes in images by enhancing the accuracy of structure restoration and the ability to recover texture details. This method divides the inpainting task into two phases: edge prediction and image inpainting. Specifically, in the edge prediction phase, a transformer architecture is designed to combine axial attention with standard self-attention. This design enhances the extraction capability of global structural features and location awareness. It also balances the complexity of self-attention operations, resulting in accurate prediction of the edge structure in the defective region. In the image inpainting phase, a multi-scale fusion attention module is introduced. This module makes full use of multi-level distant features and enhances local pixel continuity, thereby significantly improving the quality of image inpainting. To evaluate the performance of our method, comparative experiments are conducted on several datasets, including CelebA, Places2, and Facade. Quantitative experiments show that our method outperforms the other mainstream methods. Specifically, it improves Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structure Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) by 1.141~3.234 db and 0.083~0.235, respectively. Moreover, it reduces Learning Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) by 0.0347~0.1753 and 0.0104~0.0402, respectively. Qualitative experiments reveal that our method excels at reconstructing images with complete structural information and clear texture details. Furthermore, our model exhibits impressive performance in terms of the number of parameters, memory cost, and testing time.

Inpainting Assisted Self Recovery with Decreased Embedding Data.

Image Inpainting Based on Gradient Weighted Patch Propagation and Color Rectification

A Lossless Data Hiding Based on Dynamic Reference Pixel of Image Block

Lossless Data Hiding Scheme Based on Adjacent Pixel Difference

Reversible Data Hiding Based on Reference Pixel of Block

Reversible data hiding scheme using reference pixel and multi-layer embedding

Image Inpainting Based on Interactive Separation Network and Progressive Reconstruction Algorithm

Reference Image-Assisted Auxiliary Feature Fusion in Image Inpainting

Free-Form Image Inpainting with Separable Gate Encoder-Decoder Network

Deep Blind Image Inpainting

Effective Image and Video Error Concealment using RST-Invariant Partial Patch Matching Model and Exemplar-based Inpainting

Reversible Data Hiding Based on Multilevel Histogram Modification and Sequential Recovery

Image error concealment base on lossless self-embedding

Image Inpainting Anti-Forensics Network Via Attention-Guided Hierarchical Reconstruction

Reversible Data Hiding Based on Hybrid Prediction and Interleaving Histogram Modification with Single Seed Pixel Recovery.

Image Inpainting Technique Incorporating Edge Prior and Attention Mechanism

The Improved Image Inpainting Algorithm Via Encoder and Similarity Constraint

Image Inpainting by End-to-End Cascaded Refinement With Mask Awareness

An Edge Information and Mask Shrinking Based Image Inpainting Approach

Image Self-Embedding with Large-Area Restoration Capability

Assessing Image Inpainting Via Re-Inpainting Self-Consistency Evaluation