Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe how repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the hierarchical linear model (HLM) are used to evaluate intervention effect and to compare these methods, especially in relation to their requirements regarding assumptions, number of repeated measures, completeness of repeated measures, and equal intervals between measurements.APPROACH: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) data sets (101 residents in 14 nursing homes, five times) were analyzed to explain differences between repeated-measures ANOVA and the HLM.RESULTS: More detailed information is available when HLM is used. For example, repeated-measures ANOVA showed that there is a statistically significant difference on overall mean ADAS scores between the married and nonmarried groups. The HLM analysis showed more detailed information; the ADAS score of the married group was higher by 6.4 than that of the nonmarried group on the adjusted average ADAS scores (during the whole data collection period). Repeated-measures ANOVA does not provide results on the within-subject changes with days. The HLM provides the specific conclusion that ADAS scores were increased by the one unit of "days" variable (0.017) when days were included.DISCUSSION: Hierarchical linear model is a powerful statistical method that can be applied to longitudinal research to evaluate an intervention at multiple levels. The major differences between the repeated-measures ANOVA and the HLM can be summarized as follows: The HLM (a) has less strict assumptions, (b) has more flexible data requirements (dealing with the missing data), and (c) stresses individual change over group differences. More stringent assumptions should be satisfied in repeated-measures ANOVA than in the HLM. The HLM may resolve important statistical issues that have existed in repeated-measures ANOVA. The HLM has more flexible data requirements in that it (a) can be utilized when the measurement data collection points are unequal and (b) may be used when researchers do not have data for all follow-up points, whereas the repeated-measures ANOVA requires a fixed time series design (equal interval, equal number of time points).

Analysis of Repeated Measure Data and its Implementations of SAS in Single-factor Randomized Complete Block Design

A note on extending Scheffé's modified multiple-comparison procedure to other analysis situations

Mixed Model Applications to the Analysis of Repeated Measures Data in Clinical Trials

Data Analysis Strategies for Repeated Measures Data in Clinical Trials

Use of Repeated Measures Data Analysis for Field Trials with Annual and Perennial Crops

Rerandomization and covariate adjustment in split-plot designs

A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements

The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review

Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures.

The Analysis of Repeated Measures Designs Involving Multiple Dependent Variables

The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. II. Treatment structure and the general analysis of variance

Design-Based Theory for Lasso Adjustment in Randomized Block Experiments and Rerandomized Experiments

Randomization-based Joint Central Limit Theorem and Efficient Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Block 2K Factorial Experiments

Repeated measures analysis of variance: application to tree research

Repeated-measure analyses: Which one? A survey of statistical models and recommendations for reporting

Analysis of variance for repeated measures data: A generalized estimating equations approach

Application of one-way ANOVA in completely randomized experiments

Discussion of Main Effect in Repeated Measures ANOVA

Application of Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance and Hierarchical Linear Model in Nursing Research