Abstract:The strategy selection process plays a crucial role in evolutionary dynamics when we study the spontaneous emergence of cooperation under the framework of evolutionary game theory. In most previous studies, it is assumed that individuals choose role models randomly from their neighbors. However, by considering the heterogeneity of individuals' influence in the real society, preferential selection is more realistic. Here, we associate an individuals' attractiveness with payoff satisfaction, which characterized the possibility of changing his strategy. We propose a preferential selection mechanism based on payoff satisfaction and memory in the spatial prisoner's dilemma games on square lattice networks and Erdős-Rényi networks and Barabási-Albert scale-free networks. People might prefer to learn from those with higher satisfaction in real life. Therefore, they are usually more preferable to choose individuals with higher satisfaction when selecting learning role model. We introduce an expected payoff to describe the level of individual satisfaction and memory length to represent the memory capacity of the individual. However, the expectation of defectors and cooperators may be different obviously in the real society. And in general, the expectation of the defector is higher than that of the cooperator. So we want to explore the distribution of expected payoffs that can improve the cooperation level. We investigate the effects of expected payoffs and memory length on cooperation. The results show that cooperation could be promoted when individuals prefer to choose more satisfied neighbors. And the size of expected payoffs and memory length also has different effects on the evolutionary game process. Besides, we investigate the robustness of the network topology, and find that the qualitative features of the results are unchanged.

Preferential Selection Promotes Cooperation in A Spatial Public Goods Game

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Social Selection of Game Organizers Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Selective Investment Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Game

Promotion of Cooperation Induced by Nonuniform Payoff Allocation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Towards preferential selection in the prisoner's dilemma game

Preferential selection based on payoff satisfaction and memory promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma games

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games

Partner selections in public goods games with constant group size

Emergence of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game with Conditional Participation

When selection pays: structured public goods game with a generalized interaction mode

Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games

Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game

Group diversity promotes cooperation in the spatial public goods game

Preferential selection to promote cooperation on degree–degree correlation networks in spatial snowdrift games

Cooperation Transition of Spatial Public Goods Games

Evolution of Public Cooperation with Weighted and Conditional Strategies

Spatial public goods games on any population structure

Threshold-initiated spatial public goods games