A Contrast Study of Two Different Block Anesthesia of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Used for the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third-Molar

ZHANG Guo-quan,ZHANG Guo-zhi,WENG Ru-lian,TANG Jian-ming,XU Min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2011.07.016
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To discuss a more effective method of block anesthesia of inferior alveolar nerve.Method: 150 cases of patients who need extraction of the impacted mandibular third-molar by opening flapping and deboning were selected and divided randomly into three groups:Experimental group(50 cases) with Gow-Gates mandibular block,control group one(50 cases) with block anesthesia of internal ramus prominence and control group two(50 cases) with extra infiltration anesthesia of buccal mesiocclusion and distocclusion and lingual side of offending teeth after the same injection method as control group one.The pain situation was observed by Visual Analogue Scale.All the three groups used the articaine hydrochlorine and epinephrine tartrate injection.Result:The cases performed Gow-Gates mandibular block showed less pain than control group one,but contrast to control group two,the method showed no superiority.Conclusion:The conventional block anesthesia of internal ramus prominence added with local infiltration anesthesia could enhance the success ratio of block anesthesia of inferior alveolar nerve effectively and achieve the same effect as Gow-Gates mandibular block.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?