Safety and efficacy assessment for preoperative portal vein embolization with steel coils in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

YI Bin,XU Ai-min,YU Yong,WANG Xiao-yan,LIU Chen,LUO Xiang-ji,YAN Pei-ning,JIANG Xiao-qing,ZHANG Bai-he

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2009.02.002

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy for preoperative portal vein embolization with steel coils in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods Between Apr.2007 and May 2008,50 patients were treated in our department.Eight patients with future liver remnant (FLR) less than 50%,and received portal vein embolization (PVE),were enrolled in PVE-Group; six patients who finally received major hepatectomy entered hepatectomy group A.In the same period,17 patients who did not receive PVE before major hepatectomy belonged to hepatectomy group B.The subjects underwent PVE all belonging to Bismuth type Ⅳ comprised 6 men and 2 women,with an average age of (51±7.8) (range,41-61) years,had accompanied hepatitis B cirrhosis in 2.Before PVE,7 of 8 patients underwent selective biliary drainage of future liver remnant (FLR),total serum bilirubin (TB) level was at (89.7±40.0)(12.4-140.5)μmol/L.Ipsilateral or contralateral percutaneous transhepatic PVEs were performed with multiple steel coils after super selection of portal branch,consequently embolized veins contented branches of left(1),right(4) and left plus anterior right(3).Volumetric CT scans were measured before and 2 weeks after PVE.After the embolization,adverse effects,changes in liver enzymes,volume of unembolized liver lobe,post-hepatectomy mortality and morbidity were analyzed. Results Successful PVEs achieved in all cases with complication occurred only in one patient as bile leakage (1/8),whose planned hepatectomy did not prolong after proper celiac drainage.Slight adverse event of PVE occurred also in one patient as migration of a few coil emboli(1/8) without special treatment.There were no statistic difference in liver enzymes between before and 3d after PVE.Between the volume parameters of unembolized liver [(824±211) cm3 vs(770±205)cm3,P<0.01],also between the unembolized/total ratios [(46.2±9.1)% vs (43.1±8.6)%,P<0.05] 2 weeks after and before PVE,statistical differences exist.Deficiency of FLR regeneration appeared in one(1/8) with underlying cirrhosis and prevented him away from receiving operation.Tumor progression(1/8) kept another patient from hepatectomy.Finally (17±4)(13-24)d after PVE,6 patients underwent major hepatectomy with TB level at (47.6±26.6)(11.5-84.8)μmol/L(comparing to before PVE,P<0.05).These procedures contented extended left hepatectomy(1),left trisectionectomy(2),right hepatectomy(1) and extended right hepatectomy(2).Between hepatectomy group A and B,neither mortality (0 vs 5.9%,P>0.05) nor morbidity (50.0% vs 52.9%,P>0.05) differed statistically.In group B,one died from acute liver failure and another suffered liver dysfunction but recovered at last.Within group A,one possessed cirrhosis got liver abscess and liver failure also died 4.2 months after hepatecomy. Conclusions Before performing right or extended hemihepatectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma,our method of PVE with coils is safe and can efficiently induce the regeneration of FLR.After more aggressive major hepatomy,its postoperative mortality and morbidity do not increase.