Study on the Different Treatments for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Wen SHUAI,Xiang-li HONG,Shi-hua BAO,Ping CHEN,Hai-yun WANG
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the effectiveness of different treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy.Methods:Ninety cases of cesarean scar pregnancy were randomly divided into 3 groups:MTX group(n=30),MTX+gestational sac puncture group(n=30),and artery embolization group(n=30).Serum β-hCG,blood flow index in cesarean scar and complete blood count were measured,respectively.Results:1) The sharpest declines of serum β-hCG were found in artery embolization group,followed by puncture group,and the slowest declines in MTX group.2) Blood flow index in cesarean scar was significantly lower than preoperation in the artery embolization group after treatment for 1-2 weeks.3) The average hemoglobin(Hb) level was 116.4±8.7 g/L before treatment,while blood cells(WBC) was 6.56±1.99 ×109/L.Two weeks after the treatment,the average Hb was 113.4±11.6 g/L,WBC was 7.35±2.77 ×109/L.There was no statistically significant difference among these groups(P>0.05).4) The median length of hospital stay in MTX group was 38.4±8.4 d,33.5±4.0 d in pregnant sac puncture group,and 16.4±7.9 d in artery embolization group.There were significant differences among the three groups(P<0.05).5)Next menstrual time in MTX group was 60.0±9.6 d,pregnant sac puncture group needed 50.7± 6.5 d,artery embolization group needed 36.7±16.7 d.There were significant differences among the three groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:Uterine artery embolization plus curettage surgery is worthy of popularization and application of technology for treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?