Compatibility of High-Delta M(2) Nu(E) and (Nu)over-Bar(e) Neutrino Oscillation Searches

A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,C. E. Anderson,A. O. Bazarko,S. J. Brice,B. C. Brown,L. Bugel,J. Cao,L. Coney,J. M. Conrad,D. C. Cox,A. Curioni,Z. Djurcic,D. A. Finley,B. T. Fleming,R. Ford,F. G. Garcia,G. T. Garvey,C. Green,J. A. Green,T. L. Hart,E. Hawker,R. Imlay,R. A. Johnson,G. Karagiorgi,P. Kasper,T. Katori,T. Kobilarcik,I. Kourbanis,S. Koutsoliotas,E. M. Laird,S. K. Linden,J. M. Link,Y. Liu,W. C. Louis,K. B. M. Mahn,W. Marsh,P. S. Martin,G. McGregor,W. Metcalf,P. D. Meyers,F. Mills,G. B. Mills,J. Monroe,C. D. Moore,R. H. Nelson,V. T. Nguyen,P. Nienaber,S. Ouedraogo,R. B. Patterson,D. Perevalov,C. C. Polly,E. Prebys,J. L. Raaf,H. Ray,B. P. Roe,A. D. Russell,V. Sandberg,R. Schirato,D. Schmitz,M. H. Shaevitz,F. C. Shoemaker,D. Smith,M. Soderberg,M. Sorel,P. Spentzouris,I. Stancu,R. J. Stefanski,M. Sung,H. A. Tanaka,R. Tayloe,M. Tzanov,R. Van de Water,M. O. Wascko,D. H. White,M. J. Wilking,H. J. Yang,G. P. Zeller,E. D. Zimmerman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.78.012007
IF: 5.407
2008-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:This article presents the compatibility of experimental data from neutrino oscillation experiments with a high-Delta m(2) two-neutrino oscillation hypothesis. Data is provided by the Bugey, Karlsruhe Rutherford Medium Energy Neutrino Experiment 2 (KARMEN2), Los Alamos Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), and MiniBooNE experiments. The LSND, KARMEN2, and MiniBooNE results are 25.36% compatible within a two-neutrino oscillation hypothesis. However, the point of maximal compatibility is found in a region that is excluded by the Bugey data. A joint analysis of all four experiments, performed in the sin(2)2 theta vs Delta m(2) region common to all data, finds a maximal compatibility of 3.94%. This result does not account for additions to the neutrino oscillation model from sources such as CP violation or sterile neutrinos.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?