A comparative study on the outcome of expandable intramedullary nailing system and proximal femoral nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures in aged patients

Xiao-lin LI,Xiao-wen YU,Cong-feng LUO,Chang-qing ZHANG,Beng-fang ZENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-8296.2007.06.012
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To comparatively analyze the outcome of expandable intramedullary nailing system (Fixion PF nail) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of peritrochanteric fractures in aged patients. Methods From March 2005 to September 2006, 48 aged patients with peritrochanteric fractures were treated with Fixion PF nail (=21) and PFN (n=17). Comparison was made between the two groups with respect to time of operation, size of wound, frequency of X-ray exposure, blood loss and drainage, time needed to start walking without assistance, time of fracture healing, functional recovery and complications. Results All patients were followed up for 3-22 months with a mean of 9 months. All fractures achieved bone union. Splitting of the proximal femur occurred in one case in Fixion PF nail group, and varus malunion occurred in 2 cases and dynamic screw loosening in one case in PFN group. The results of data analysis suggest that operation time and skin incision of PFN group were longer than those of Fixion PF nail group (P0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the frequency of X-ray exposure, blood loss and drainage, the time to ambulate and walk without assistance, fracture healing time, Harris scoring of the hip function and the rate of complications. Conclusions Both Fixion PF nail and PFN are good for the treatment of peritrochanteric fractures in aged patients. Fixion PF nail seams to be more suitable for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur in aged patients because of its homogenic load distribution, no need of reaming and interlocking as well as the high power of anti-rotation resulting from the head of the peg in the femoral head.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?