Early enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition after hepatectomy:A systematic review and Meta analysis
XIAO Wei-kai,CHEN Dong,Li Shao-qiang,PENG Bao-gang,LAI Jia-ming,LIANG Li-jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1647-0793.2013.01.014
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition after hepatectomy. Methods Databases such as MEDLINE EMBASE, CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about enteral nutrition(EN) versus parenteral nutrition(PN) after hepatectomy published from January, 1990 to November, 2012. The quality of the included trials was aseessed according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, and the data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 8 RCTs involving 610 patients were included. The Meta analysis showed that the EN(treatment group)was superior to the PN (control group) in the average total bilirubin(WMD=-4.29 mmol/L, 95% CI=-5.55, -3.0, P<0.05), ALT (WMD=-25.36 U/L, 95% CI=-42.45, -8.27, P=0.004), prealbumin (WMD=27.56 mg/L, 95% CI=8.99, 46.14, P=0.004), flatus time(WMD=-16.90 h, 95% CI=-21.49, -12.32, P<0.05), nutritional cost (WMD=-120.68 yuan, 95% CI=-136.61, -104.74, P<0.05). There were no difference in plasma-albumin, infectious complication and diarrhea, but abdominal distention (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.08, 3.00, P<0.05) was more common in EN group. Conclusions Compared with PN, EN used earlier after hepatectomy shows significant advantages.