Abstract:BACKGROUND: This team modified the arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation with canulated screw through very high-posteromedial portal approach to perform direct compression. Thus, the pressure of the fracture block is evenly distributed on the healing line, and the operation is convenient and fixed firmly, but its clinical effect remains to be further confirmed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation with canulated screw through very high-posteromedial portal approach and double bundle suture fixation for avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of posterior cruciate ligament. METHODS: From January 2011 to May 2017, 60 cases of the avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament (transverse diameter of fracture block > 10 mm) were treated operatively at the Orthopedics and Arthroscopic Ward Two, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, China. According to different modes of operation in different periods, patients were assigned to two groups. In the canulated screw group (n=31), patients were treated with canulated screw through very high-posteromedial portal approach. In the suture group (n=29), patients were treated with double bundle suture fixation through posteromedial portal approach. General conditions were compared between the two groups. Knee function was assessed with the Intemational Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores. Knee stability was evaluated with KT-2000 and posterior drawer test. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) All the patients were followed up (range 6-12 months). (2) The average operation time was (63.49±3.97) minutes in the canulated screw group and (87.28±3.46) minutes in the suture group (P < 0.05). At 3 months after surgery, all the patients were healed. (3) At the final follow-up, in the canulated screw group, the negative rate of posterior drawer test was 90%. Lysholm scores were 94.89±4.75. IKDC scores were 94.01±3.25. In the suture group, the negative rate of posterior drawer test was 90%. Lysholm scores were 95.56±3.63. IKDC scores were 95.52±4.72. No significant difference was determined between the two groups (P > 0.05). (4) KT-2000 measurement results revealed that there were no significant differences between the surgical knee and the normal knee in both groups (canulated screw group:(2.53±1.02)mm versus(2.12±0.83)mm;suture group:(2.65±0.82)mm versus(2.19±0.63)mm (P > 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was detected in the affected knee of KT-2000 results between the two groups. (5) Both arthroscopic reduction with canulated screw through very high-posteromedial portal approach and double bundle suture fixation can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes, but arthroscopic reduction with canulated screw through very high-posteromedial portal approach in patients with fracture block diameter > 10 mm can result in shorter operation time, more reliable fixation, and thus permit an early postoperative functional exercise.

The arthroscopic fixation technique from posterior middle portal for tibial avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament

Arthroscopic Suture Fixation of Tibial Avulsion Fracture of Posterior Cruciate Ligament

Surgical Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fractures Using a Locking Compression Hook Plate: A Case Series.

Arthroscopic Fixation of an Avulsion Fracture of the Tibia Involving the Posterior Cruciate Ligament

Arthroscopic Treatment of Acute Tibial Avulsion Fracture of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament with Suture Fixation Technique Through Y-Shaped Bone Tunnels

Treatment of Tibia Avulsion Fracture of Posterior Cruciate Ligament with High-Strength Suture Fixation under Arthroscopy

[Early effectiveness of minimally invasive open reduction and internal fixation versus arthroscopic double-tunnel suture fixation for tibial avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament]

Arthroscopic treatment with canulated screw fixation through very high-posteromedial portal approach versus double bundle suture fixation for avulsion fracture of tibial attachment of posterior cruciate ligament

Open Reduction and Fixation with Cannulated Screws Via the Modified Burks-Schaffer Approach Versus Arthroscopic EndoButton Plating for Avulsion Fracture of the Tibial Attachment of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament

Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic high-intensity suture binding combined with button plate suspension fixation in the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures

Clinical observation of knee arthroscopy with double ETHIBOND sutures in the treatment of tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament

[Treatment of Tibial Avulsion Fracture of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament with Open Reduction and Steel-Wire Internal Fixation].

Treatment of Avulsion Fracture of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Insertion by Minimally Invasive Approach in Posterior Medial Knee

Modified Small Incision Behind Knee to Match Arthroscopy for Tibial Avulsion Fracture of Posterior Cruciate Ligament

Treatment of Tibial Avulsion Fracture at the Insertion of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament through a Minimally Posteromedial Approach

Anterior arthroscopic-assisted fixation of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures

Arthroscopic management of avulsion fractures of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament: A novel technique and mid-term outcomes

Arthroscopic suture fixation for avulsionractures in the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament

Arthroscopic Ethibond Suture and Anchor Fixation for Avulsion Fracture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Insertion

[Arthroscopic suspension fixation with Endobutton in treatment of tibial insertion avulsion fractures of posterior cruciate ligament]

A Minimally Invasive Postero-Medial Approach with Suture Anchors for Isolated Tibial Avulsion Fracture of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament