Abstract:Context: Demonstrating high reliability and safety for safety-critical systems (SCSs) remains a hard problem. Diverse evidence needs to be combined in a rigorous way: in particular, results of operational testing with other evidence from design and verification. Growing use of machine learning in SCSs, by precluding most established methods for gaining assurance, makes evidence from operational testing even more important for supporting safety and reliability claims.Objective: We revisit the problem of using operational testing to demonstrate high reliability. We use Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) as a current example. AVs are making their debut on public roads: methods for assessing whether an AV is safe enough are urgently needed. We demonstrate how to answer 5 questions that would arise in assessing an AV type, starting with those proposed by a highly-cited study.Method: We apply new theorems extending our Conservative Bayesian Inference (CBI) approach, which exploit the rigour of Bayesian methods while reducing the risk of involuntary misuse associated (we argue) with now-common applications of Bayesian inference; we define additional conditions needed for applying these methods to AVs.Results: Prior knowledge can bring substantial advantages if the AV design allows strong expectations of safety before road testing. We also show how naive attempts at conservative assessment may lead to over-optimism instead; why extrapolating the trend of disengagements (take-overs by human drivers) is not suitable for safety claims; use of knowledge that an AV has moved to a "less stressful" environment.Conclusion: While some reliability targets will remain too high to be practically verifiable, our CBI approach removes a major source of doubt: it allows use of prior knowledge without inducing dangerously optimistic biases. For certain ranges of required reliability and prior beliefs, CBI thus supports feasible, sound arguments. Useful conservative claims can be derived from limited prior knowledge.

Dynamic Analysis of Bayesian Audit Strategies with Tests of Controls and Reliability Modeling

Should We Learn Probabilistic Models for Model Checking? A New Approach and An Empirical Study.

Combining Model Checking and Testing with an Application to Reliability Prediction and Distribution

Suspected riboflavin deficiency in a golden eagle.

Demonstrating software reliability using possibly correlated tests: Insights from a conservative Bayesian approach

The Unnecessity of Assuming Statistically Independent Tests in Bayesian Software Reliability Assessments

Bayesian Hypothesis Tests Using Nonparametric Statistics

Enhancing Performance of Random Testing Through Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods

Structural reliability analysis by line sampling: A Bayesian active learning treatment

Structural reliability analysis: A Bayesian perspective

Bayesian methodology for reliability model acceptance

Dynamic pruning-based Bayesian support vector regression for reliability analysis

An Analysis of the Group Dynamics Surrounding Internal Control Assessment in Information Systems Audit and Assurance Domains

Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Sampling Audit Evidence Using a Naive Bayes Classifier

Robust Multiple Testing under High-dimensional Dynamic Factor Model

Sampling Audit Evidence Using a Naive Bayes Classifier

Post-Incident Audits on Cyber Insurance Discounts

Risk-limiting Financial Audits via Weighted Sampling without Replacement

Rapid and Scalable Bayesian AB Testing

Assessing safety-critical systems from operational testing: A study on autonomous vehicles

Man Versus Machine: Complex Estimates and Auditor Reliance on Artificial Intelligence