Abstract:Currently, there is no effective analysis algorithm to calculate and evaluate the residual performance of flexible barriers after suffering rockfall impact. To solve this problem, a novel approach for assessing and quantifying the residual performance of flexible barriers through the deflection degree of different components is proposed, based on the substantial experimental database from impact tests that were conducted with impact energies between 750 kJ and 1500 kJ, revealing a high correlation between the three-stage macroscopic deflection characteristics and the residual performance. The approach consists of two significant aspects, one is the calculation method of the residual protection capacity, which was established according to the simplified calculation method of the energy dissipation of the dissipators. The other aspect is the damage identification method for the barrier system based on the deflection of key components, which was determined by comparing the deflection angle of the post and the punching deflection of the net obtained from the analytical geometric model with the ultimate deflection of those components calibrated by tests. Utilizing the ultimate force-deflection relationship calibrated by tests, a method to discriminate the system damage based on the analytical calculation value of the deflection of key components is established. Furthermore, both full-scale tests and numerical simulations were conducted to validate the proposed analytical calculation method. The tested flexible barrier had a nominal energy level of 2000 kJ, and the tests included service energy level (SEL) and maximum energy level (MEL) continuous impacts. The analysis results show that the maximum calculation errors for the energy dissipated by the energy dissipators, elongation of the energy dissipator, elongation of the wire ring, and out-of-plane deflection angle of the post are -3%, 10%, 12%, and -8%, respectively. The evaluation results of the residual performance as well as the damage identification both have satisfied agreement with the test results, confirming the reliability and applicability of the analytical method to engineering maintenance decisions.

Evaluating Defeaturing-Induced Impact on Model Analysis.

Estimating Defeaturing-Induced Engineering Analysis Errors for Arbitrary 3D Features

Mixed-Dimensional Model Analysis under Dimension Reduction Error Control

Engineering Analysis Error Estimation when Removing Finite-Sized Features in Nonlinear Elliptic Problems.

A Deformation History-Based Approach for Ultra-Low Cycle Fatigue Damage Evaluation of Steel Structures

A Goal-Oriented Error Estimator for the Analysis of Simplified Designs

Estimation of Impacts of Removing Arbitrarily Constrained Domain Details to the Analysis of Incompressible Fluid Flows

Applicability Evaluation of Damage Evolution Models in Simulating Repeated Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Composite Laminates

Finite Element Analysis of Steel Scuttle

A New Approach for Studying Fatigue Damage

Adaptive analysis-aware defeaturing: the case of Neumann boundary conditions

Application of Smeared Cracking and Damaged Plasticity Models in FEA of CFT

Improved Discontinuous Deformation Analysis Method for Modeling Tensile Cracking in Quasi-Brittle Materials

Analysis and Simulation of Machining Deformation Resulting from Residual Stress

Analysing the Influence in Real-Time Calculation Fatigue Consume Caused by Model Layer of Turbing Rotor

Experimental validation of an efficient strategy for FE model updating and damage identification in tubular structures

An Equilibrated Flux A Posteriori Error Estimator for Defeaturing Problems

Analysis-aware defeaturing of complex geometries with Neumann features

Visualization and interpretation of the impact failure behavior of textile composites using a highly efficient Meso-FE model

An evaluation method for quantifying the residual performance of flexible rockfall barriers after impact

Anti-Defect Design for Mechanical Elements under Severe Condition Based on a Half-Real Defect Model