Abstract:STUDY DESIGN:Laminoplasty was simulated using a computer-assisted technique to assess the amount of canal expansion. OBJECTIVES:This study was designed to clarify the relationship between laminoplasty opening size and increase in sagittal canal diameter, increase in canal area, and the angle of the opened lamina following laminoplasty, and to determine whether a spinous process-splitting laminoplasty achieves the similar canal expansion as a single open-door method. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Single and double-door cervical laminoplasty (SDCL and DDCL, respectively) have been widely used in the treatment of multilevel stenotic conditions. However, the relationship between laminoplasty opening size and spinal canal expansion following laminoplasty, and the comparison of postoperative spinal canal expansion between single and double-door techniques have not been well investigated. METHODS:SDCL and DDCL, based on preoperative computerized tomography scans of 34 patients who had undergone the laminoplasty surgery, were simulated using a computer-assisted technique. Laminoplasty with an opening size of 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 mm were simulated to determine the amount of canal enlargement with the various opening size. RESULTS:Sagittal diameter, canal area, and lamina angle were increased steadily following either single or double-door laminoplasty with the door opened from 6 to 18 mm. Significant positive correlation was found between laminoplasty opening size and increase in sagittal diameter (R2 = 0.969 and P = 0.001 in SDCL; R2 = 0.926 and P < 0.001 in DDCL), increase in canal area (R2 = 0.961 and P < 0.001 in SDCL; R2 = 0.937 and P < 0.001 in DDCL), and lamina angle (R2 = 0.959 and P < 0.001 in SDCL; R2 = 0.943 and P < 0.001 in DDCL). No significant correlation was observed between preoperative sagittal diameter and increase in sagittal diameter of the spinal canal, whereas significant positive correlation was found between preoperative cross-section area and increase in cross-section area of the spinal canal. The differences between postoperative canal increase in sagittal diameter and canal area for the single versus double-door technique were statistically significant when the door was opened by more than 12 mm (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Our investigation provides insight into canal expansion after laminoplasty. The increased amount of canal following laminoplasty can be predicted by the regression equations. This may allow preoperative determination of the optimal size of the opening needed to establish adequate canal space for the spinal cord. Both single and double-door techniques of laminoplasty provide sufficient room for posterior migration of the spinal cord, although gaining different canal expansion.

Double-door Expansive Laminoplasty Using Allogenic Bone Spacers

A Clinical Study of C2 Dome-Like Expansive Laminoplasty and C2 Expansive Open-Door Laminoplastyinupper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

The Effect of the Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty on the Three-Dimensional Motion and Stiffness of the Cervical Spine

Clinical application of a new plate fixation system in open-door laminoplasty.

Effect of C-1 Single-door Laminoplasty on Symptomatic Atlas Canal Stenosis

[Comparison of Allogenic Versus Ostetic Artificial Bone in Double Door Laminoplasty].

Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive <i>Versus</i> C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament <i>A Retrospective Cohort Study</i>

Treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminoplasty based on individual accurate transverse diameter of the spinal canal

Extended Laminoplasty for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving the C2 Segment

Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty: in Situ Reconstruction of Extensor Muscle Insertion on the C2 Spinous Process Combined with Titanium Miniplates Internal Fixation

Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty

Long-term Results of Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty of Cervical Spine

Initial clinical experiences of the muscle-preserving double door cervical laminoplasty with adjustable mini plates

Modified open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Expansive open-door laminoplasty for degenerative spinal stenosis in patients with multi-segmental cervical spondy-lotic myelopathy

Cervical posterior laminoplasty operation using T-saw and coralline hydroxyapatite spacer]

Application of hydroxyapatite artificial bone in bilateral open-door posterior cervical expansive laminoplasty

Clinical application of modified single open-door laminoplasty using Itoh method

Prediction of spinal canal expansion following cervical laminoplasty: a computer-simulated comparison between single and double-door techniques.

The clinical application of a modified open door laminoplasty using anchor method

Long-term clinical study of modified posterior double-door cervical laminoplasty, more than ten years follow-up