Abstract:In regional economic development,why are the Chinese local governments' roles so different? Applying the quantitative method,we have compared the nominees of the five China Local Government Innovation Awards(2001-2010) and analyzed the inter-regional,inter-category and cross-year data of these nominees to probe into the correlation between the economic growth and the local government innovations in the eastern,central and western regions of China. The number of innovations of the local governments in the eastern region is far above that in the western and the central regions,and the number is greater in the urban area than in the rural area,both of which indicate the relationship between innovative ideas and economic growth. There is a significant inter-regional difference in the innovation types.The eastern region,with a higher level of economic development,centers around administrative innovations to meet the demand of market institutional development.One strong incentive to the political innovation in this region is economy.At the same time,its public service innovation is more effective than that in the western and the central regions.The central region has more political innovations;however,the governments in the western region show greater vitality in all kinds of innovations than the central region. Correlation Analysis has testified the significance of correlation between the administrative innovation and the economic growth.We also find that with economic development the local government innovations have gradually switched from political reform to administrative management,but attention has not sufficiently been paid to public service innovations. Therefore,the regional economic growth gives the local governments an endogenous incentive to innovate and there is more vitality in innovation in the developed areas than the undeveloped ones.On one hand,government innovations have greatly promoted the local economic development and regional marketization process and provided the necessary local experiences for the overall economic institutional reform.On the other hand the local government innovation becomes the crucial element for Chinese government innovation. The policy implication of this research for Chinese social transformation is that the state government should ensure greater policy incentive and leave institutional space for local government innovations in their regional development.China's central government should set up an overall and top-down system of power decentralization and provide the institutional incentive for local governments to implement public service and political innovations.At the same time,the central government should put stress on local innovative autonomy which generates the ability to solve local problems.China cannot rely on the local economic development alone for its innovation incentive.Rather,it must push for the reform of political decentralization so as to guarantee the central authority and local autonomy.

The Relationship between Local Governing-elites and Institutional Innovations: A Case Study of Hangzhou

Experience Summary and Theoretical Connotation of 'Hangzhou Model'

Taizhou Model: Institutional Innovation and the Development of Private Economy

The Motion And Sustainability Of Local Government Innovation: Based On The "Town-Level City" In Wenzhou

Study on the Implementation Evaluation and Management Innovation of Strong Town to Expand its Powers:A Case Study of Hangzhou

Democratization,Legitimacy and Governance: Five Types of Institutional Innovations and their Political Consequences at Township-level in China

Policy Innovation of Local Officials in China: the Administrative Choice

State-Firm Strategic Coordination and Technological Innovation in Shanghai and Shenzhen: A Comparative Study

Institutional conformity, entrepreneurial governance and local contingency: Problematizing central-local dynamics in localizing China's low-income housing policy

Local Governments Innovations and Governance Changing--A Comparative Case Study of Two Chinese Local Governments

Institutional Innovation Modes of Political Entrepreneur——Case Studies of Zhejiang Geely, China Telecom and Hainan Kaili

Institutions, Chain Governance and the Predicament of Local Upgrading: A Case Study of Hangzhou’s Mobile Game Industry

Social Organization Management System:Innovations of Local Governments

Chinese Local Government Innovation Sustainability Research

The Correlation between Regional Economic Growth and Local Government Innovations:An Inter-case Analysis of the Differences between Chinese Local Governments

Research on the Sustainability of Chinese Local Government Innovations Based on Evolutionary Paradigm

Innovation of Grassroots Governance in China:Investigation and Comparison in Macro Framework

Inter-regional Diffusion of Policy Innovation in China: A Comparative Case Study

Local Governance As An Instrument In China: Case Of Purchasing Services For The Aged In Homes By The Government

Political Incentives and Local Policy Innovations in China

Structural restraints and institutional innovation in local governance: a case study of administrative examination and approval system reforms in Shunde, Ningbo, and Taizhou