Conflict Between Farmers’ Ecological Protection and Development Intention in Nature Reserve:Based on the Research Data of 660 Households of Farmers Around the National Nature Reserve in Shaanxi
SONG Wen-fei,LI Guo-ping,HAN Xian-feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.10.019
2015-01-01
China Population Resources and Environment
Abstract:The nature reserve is also facing the contradiction of the local development at the same time. Based on Shaanxi national natural protection zones around the survey data involving 660 households of farmers, we found that farmers had a certain degree of negative emotions for the ecological protection behavior, due to the interests imbalances caused by land property right limited. According to the research results, this paper points out that the distortion of income, property rights, grain allocation and ecological compensation exist in the process of ecological protection of nature reserves,and behaviors mentioned above cause problems of landless farmers,restricted land use rights, “idle land”, “differential configuration ”and “class configuration”. Based on TRA and TPB theories,taking environmental behavior intention as an important factor, and considering impact of regional background and system background on individual behavior intention, it put forward hypothesis that under the regional background and ecological compensation system defects, ecological protection “twisted behavior” affects farmers ’ protection and development conflict awarness. Through empirical research, this paper finds that the income of the farmers long-term distortions and land allocation”,“differential configuration”,and “class configuration”distortions weaken the intention of ecological protection of residents, and enhance the development intention, and reflect conflicts between the farmers’ ecological protection and the development intention, which confirms the hypothesis proposed in this paper. This study has the following policy implications: first, regarding farmers as the main body of environmental trading services, and changing the current“distorted behavior in the process of compensation”;second, establishing and perfecting the system of land property rights; third, promoting landless peasants “urbanization” process to resolve the long-term livelihood issues;third,to improving the ecological compensation system, and considering farmers’ long-term losses in the process of environmental protection;fourth, improving wild animal damage compensation system of land production.