An Attitudes and Perceptions-Based Investigation on Types of Rural Residents and Their Willingness to Accept Eco-compensation in Western China:A Case on Zhouzhi County in Xi'an City

LI Jie,LI Shuzhuo
2010-01-01
Abstract:Payment for ecosystem services has received much attention in recent years, but most of current research in China primarily focuses on macro policy analyses and design. There seems little research on attitudes or perceptions of ecosystem service suppliers such as rural households, the relationship between the payment for ecosystem services and the rural households’ losses. The paper examines rural residents’ willingness to accept eco-compensation (WTA) living in the headwater areas in western China on the basis of attitudes and perceptions of stakeholders. The authors first analyzed the status quo on the eco-compensation in Zhouzhi County in Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province. Two hundreds and eleven valid questionnaires from a rural household survey undertaken by the research group of Xian Jiaotong University in 4 administrative villages in Wangjiahe Township, Zhouzhi County, in April 2008, were received. The local rural residents’ attitudes towards local forestry policies, the willingness to accept eco-compensation, their perceptions towards changes in households’ incomes after implementation of the Slopping Land Conversion Program and establishment of the local nature reserves were investigated. A comprehensive analysis as to residents’ attitudes towards such items was made by the factor analysis and cluster analysis. Results showed that in general, there are five types of local rural residents showing significant differences in attitudes towards the forestry policies, perceptions of income change, willingness to accept the eco-compensation, and proportion of non-farming income in total household income. For example, most of the first-type local residents are engaged in agriculture and forestry, but they also have high non-farming income proportions, in the hope of developing forestry in the future and have relatively larger WTA. As for the fifth-type residents, they are the most unsatisfied with the local forestry policies, without an intention to develop forestry. Their household incomes primarily come from non-farming activities, but they have the largest WTA. It was suggested that the local payment for ecosystem services be around 300 yuan/(mu·a), and different rural resident types be taken into consideration while formulating eco-compensation mechanisms by governments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?