Validation of the Significance of the Three Risk Groups in Predicting the Risk of Lymph Node Metastases in Chinese Patients with Penile Cancer

ZHU Yao,YE Ding-wei,YAO Xu-dong,ZHANG Shi-ling,DAI Bo,ZHANG Hai-liang,SHEN Yi-jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2011.04.005
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To validate the significance of the three risk groups(Solsona,Ornellas and European Association of Urology risk groups) in predicting the risk of lymph node metastases in Chinese patients with penile cancer.Methods Data of 110 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma with clinical node-negative manifestations were retrospectively reviewed.All patients underwent surgical resection of the primary focus and lymphadenectomy.The predictive accuracy of each risk classification was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve.The area under curve was calculated and compared with the method of bootstrap.Results Of the 110 patients,26(23.6%) had lymph node involvement.According to Solsona risk stratification,the risk of lymph node metastases were 5.9%,17.0% and 65.2% in low,intermediate,and high risk group,respectively.Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that Solsona risk group achieved highest predictive accuracy(area under curve = 0.79),which was significantly better than that of the Orenallas and European Association of Urology risk groups.Conclusions Solsona risk group had better predictive accuracy in Chinese patients with penile cancer.The prognostic significance of these risk groups,however,still needs further improvement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?