Abstract:Background Pulse wave analysis using the SphygmoCor system allows the estimation of central blood pressures (BP). However, there is controversy over its accuracy for clinical use. Methods In 45 patients undergoing coronary angiography, we compared the ascending aorta BPs measured by the invasive catheter with the estimations by the SphygmoCor system, using paired t-tests, simple correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plots. Results The estimation of central systolic BP by SphygmoCor was lower, although statistically insignificant, than that measured by the catheter (144 ± 29 vs. 148 ± 30 mm Hg; P = 0.98). The SD of the difference amounted to 17 mm Hg. Both measured and estimated central systolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than the brachial systolic BP (156 ± 30 mm Hg). The diastolic BP measured at the brachial artery (87 ± 15 mm Hg) and provided by SphygmoCor (90 ± 15 mm Hg) were systematically higher (P < 0.001) than that measured by the catheter (74 ± 13 mm Hg). The SphygmoCor system underestimated the central pulse pressure by − 20 ± 14 mm Hg compared to the catheter method. The correlation coefficients for systolic BP, diastolic BP and pulse pressure between catheter measurements and the SphygmoCor estimations were 0.84, 0.60 and 0.82 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions When the radial waveform was calibrated with the oscillometric brachial pressures, the SphygmoCor system could not provide accurate estimation of central BPs. The inaccurate measurement of cuff pressure was the major limiting factor for the use of the transfer function in the clinical settings. Background Pulse wave analysis using the SphygmoCor system allows the estimation of central blood pressures (BP). However, there is controversy over its accuracy for clinical use. Methods In 45 patients undergoing coronary angiography, we compared the ascending aorta BPs measured by the invasive catheter with the estimations by the SphygmoCor system, using paired t-tests, simple correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plots. Results The estimation of central systolic BP by SphygmoCor was lower, although statistically insignificant, than that measured by the catheter (144 ± 29 vs. 148 ± 30 mm Hg; P = 0.98). The SD of the difference amounted to 17 mm Hg. Both measured and estimated central systolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.001) lower than the brachial systolic BP (156 ± 30 mm Hg). The diastolic BP measured at the brachial artery (87 ± 15 mm Hg) and provided by SphygmoCor (90 ± 15 mm Hg) were systematically higher (P < 0.001) than that measured by the catheter (74 ± 13 mm Hg). The SphygmoCor system underestimated the central pulse pressure by − 20 ± 14 mm Hg compared to the catheter method. The correlation coefficients for systolic BP, diastolic BP and pulse pressure between catheter measurements and the SphygmoCor estimations were 0.84, 0.60 and 0.82 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions When the radial waveform was calibrated with the oscillometric brachial pressures, the SphygmoCor system could not provide accurate estimation of central BPs. The inaccurate measurement of cuff pressure was the major limiting factor for the use of the transfer function in the clinical settings.

Reference Values for the Arterial Pulse Wave in Chinese

The Relevance of Pulse Pressure Level and Pulse Pressure Index to the Degree of Coronary Disease

The Association of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components with Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity in South China.

Relationship Between Pulse Pressure and Relative Pulse Wave Velocity in Patients with Essential Hypertension

Reference Values of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity for Northern Chinese.

E0253 Epidemiological Characteristics and Reference Ranges of Brachialankle Pulse Wave Velocity in China

Relation of Pulse Pressure and Pulse Pressure Index to Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis

Predictive Performance and Optimal Cut-Off Points of Blood Pressure for Identifying Arteriosclerosis among Adults in Eastern China

Validation of the Central Blood Pressure Estimation by the SphygmoCor System in Chinese

Pulse pressure and its association with body composition among Chinese men and women without diagnosed hypertension: the China Kadoorie Biobank

Pulse Pressure in Prediction of Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-Aged Chinese Cohort

Reference equations for pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, amplitude of forward and backward wave in a European general adult population

Beat-to-beat, Reading-to-reading, and Day-to-day Blood Pressure Variability in Relation to Organ Damage in Untreated Chinese

PP.41.28

The value of pulse pressure for the severity of coronary heart disease in elderly

Age Dependency of Peripheral and Central Systolic Blood Pressures: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Observations in a Chinese Population

High Blood Pressure Correlates with Reduced Heart Rate Variability in Childhood

Reproducibility of Non-invasive Arterial Stiffness Measurements in Healthy Adults

Prevalence and characteristics of atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease in a Chinese population of Inner Mongolia.

Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Assessment of Arterial Stiffening with Age in European and Chinese Populations.

Prevalence of low ankle brachial index and its association with pulse pressure in an elderly Chinese population: a cross-sectional study.