[Preliminary study on evaluation system of mental workers strain based on primary and middle school teachers]
Yulong Lian,Jiwen Liu,Chen Zhang,Fang Yuan
Abstract:Objective: To use primary and middle schools teacher as samples to preliminarily build the mental work stress effect evaluation system, providing the methological platform for the research on the stress effect mechanism and mental workers interference measures. Methods: 851 teachers in primary and middle schools were selected with randomly stratified cluster methods. Use ISTA 6.0 and Life Events Evaluation Table to measure the stress factors, and use Work Tension Reaction Questionnaire, Symptom Self-Evaluation Table Questionnaire, and General Happiness Sensing Table to measure psychological stress reaction, blood sugar and blood fat, blood cortical, ACTH, nerve behavior function, for measuring physiological stress reaction. The Comprehensive Working Ability Index Table to measure working ability. And then use the mathematical model to build the mental workers stress effect evaluation system. And apply the simple random sampling method to select 400 environmental protection workers to perform cross effect validation. Results: The model fits relatively well (RMSEA = 0.100, GFI = 0.93, NNFI = 1.00, CFI = 1.00) and conforms with the theory, reflecting the loads of the indice, such as, working stress reaction, psychological stress reaction, physiological stress reaction and working ability, are relatively high. At the same time, the stress reaction of those 4 dimensions can fit the 2-grade factor (stress effect) very well. The physiological stress reaction is negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with the working stress reaction, psychological stress reaction, working ability decrease, while is positively correlated (P < 0.05) with the working stress, psychological stress reaction, physiological stress reaction and working ability decrease. The social support is the protection factor for working stress, psychological stress reaction, physiological stress reaction and working ability decrease (gamma(s) are -0.55, -0.77, 0.73, -0.79, respectively, P < 0.05). While working stress factors, social life stress factors and dangerous individual characters are the risk factors (P < 0.05) for working stress, psychological stress reaction, physiological stress reaction increase and the working ability decrease. The utilization of the environment protection workers further validates this model. Conclusion: It conforms with the theory to evaluate the mental workers stress effects from the 4 dimensions, working stress, psychological stress reaction, physiological stress reaction, and working ability. And these 4 dimensions influence each other, and also are mutually different. The working and social life stress factors influence the stress effects with certain degrees. This evaluation model can tentatively be the methodological basis for the mental workers occupational stress evaluation.