Abstract:Background:The hyperextension injury of the cervical spine is a common injury, which usually leads to cervi-cal intervertebral disc rupture and may result in cervical instability and other secondary lesions. Early, timely and accurate diagnosis will contribute to good clinical outcomes of treatment and recovery. Objective: To evaluate the reliability and agreement of the characteristic findings on X-Ray, CT and MRI examinations for the diagnosis of cervical intervertebral disc injury. Methods:A total of 44 patients who had hyperextension injury of the cervical spine and underwent anterior ap-proach operations between November 2013 and July 2016 were included in this study. Each of these patients had complete documentations of preoperative images including X-ray, CT and MRI, but no apparent evidence of vertebral fractures or dis-locations. Characteristic findings were defined as diagnostic criteria for cervical intervertebral disc injury. The imaging doc-umentations were read by three physicians separately, and the diagnosis was compared with intraoperative findings. Inter-ob-server agreement for each assessment was determined using the Kappa statistic. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, posi-tive and negative predictive values of different image features in detecting cervical disc injury were calculated. The intraop-erative findings were used as the gold standard. Results:The reliability and inter-observer agreement of each diagnostic cri-terion in X-Ray and CT for the assessment of cervical disc injury were lower than those in MRI. Thickening of the soft tis-sue anterior to the vertebral body had both high specificity (89.6%-94.8%) and accuracy (80.6%-83.9%) in assessment of the cervical disc injury. Inter-observer agreement of discontinuity on sagittal T1–weighted image (T1D) for the assessment of cervical disc injury was fair (Kappa value was 0.217, 0.267 and 0.318) , and its sensitivity (43.8%-63.5%) and positive predictive value (25.9%-33.3%) were relatively low. For longitudinal high signal intensity on sagittal T2–weighted image (T2L), the inter-observer agreement was moderate (Kappa value was 0.490, 0.439 and 0.420), and its sensitivity (68.8%-75.0%) and positive predictive value (35.5%-42.4%) were higher than those in T1D. However, the inter-observer agreement of transversal high or intermediate signal intensity on sagittal T2-weighted image (T2T) for the assessment of cervical disc injury was good (Kappa value was 0.669, 0.656 and 0.614), and its sensitivity (81.3%-87.5%), specificity (93.5%-96.1%), accuracy (92.4%-93.5%), positive predictive value (73.7%-81.3%) and negative predictive value (96.0%-97.3%) were all high. Conclusions:When thickening of the soft tissue anterior to the vertebral body is noted in X-Ray and CT images, cervi-cal disc injury may be highly suspected. T2T of MRI is a reliable indicator for cervical disc injury. MRI seems to be more predictable than X-Ray and CT in excluding the cervical disc injury, but this advantage was not statistically significant.

The value of kinematic magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of cervical disc herniation

Missed Lumbar Disc Herniations Diagnosed with Kinetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Quantitative Evaluation of Lumbar Inter-vertebral Disc Herniation Based on Magnetic Resonance Image

Dynamic evaluation of cervical disc herniation using kinetic MRI.

The Clinical Diagnostic Value of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation Based on MRI Images

Effect of cervical kinematic MRI in diagnosis and treatment of cervical spondylosis

Kinetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Spinal Degeneration: a Systematic Review.

Clinical value of MRI in treatment choice of anterior disc displacement with reduction

Reliability and agreement of the diagnosis criteria for cervical intervertebral disc injury based on the manifestations of X-Ray, CT and MRI examinations

Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an in Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.

Kinematic Evaluation of Association between Disc Bulge Migration, Lumbar Segmental Mobility, and Disc Degeneration in the Lumbar Spine Using Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The Value of MRI for Discogenic Lumbar Pain

Correlation between the MRI-based grading system and F wave as well as H-reflex in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electrophysiological Studies in Lumbar Disc Herniation

CLINICAL VALUE OF MRI IN DIAGNOSING DISCOGENIC LOW BACK PAIN

P147. Changes in Cervical Spine Canal Diameter in Neutral, Flexion, and Extension Positions on Dynamic MRI

Kinetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Lumbar Segmental Motion at Levels Adjacent to Disc Herniation

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration of the Cervico-Thoracic Junction: a Pilot Study.

[Quantitative evaluation for diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar disc herniation].

Kinematic MRI Evaluation on the Correlated Changes of Vertebral Canal of Cervical Spine

The diagnostic value of axially loaded magnetic resonance imaging in patients with degenerative disorders of lumbar spine