lnvestigating College Teachers’ lnstructional Design Competency：A Survey Study
Qunli SHENG,Lijia ZHONG,Yumei ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2015.04.005
2015-01-01
Abstract:The quality of course design has been a significant concern in the reform of higher education. The compe-tency of instructional designers played an important role in improving teaching efficacy and students’ achievements. However, empirical studies on college teachers’ instructional design competency are scarce. Based on theoretical ana-lyses and experts’ consultations, this project was to develop a questionnaire to explore college teachers’ instructional design competency. The questionnaire consists of five dimensions:designing instructional objectives;designing instruc-tional contents;instructional implementation;front-end analysis and instructional evaluation. In addition, the study also investigated college teachers’ instructional cognitive ability and knowledge system. The study intended to learn how much college teachers know about the instructional design competency and what potential factors influence the de-velopment of the instructional design expertise. The study was a random survey among the universities in Zhejiang and Shanghai. Total 192 valid responses are collected via electronic and printed questionnaires. Upon variance, relevance and regression analysis, the key finding is:To some extent, the overall level of college teachers’ instructional design competency is unsatisfactory. Although the competency of instructional implementation is sufficient, the competency of instructional evaluation need to be developed. The noticeable difference between the novices and experts are in areas of designing instructional contents and instructional objectives. College teachers’ instructional cognitive abilities have in-fluential impacts on their instructional design competency. In addition, college teachers’ knowledge system can par-tially predict their development of competency of instructional design. In conclusion, the study attempted to provide the following suggestions to teachers and educators. There is an im-balance in five defined areas of college teachers’ instructional design competency. Especially, teachers’ competency in instructional evaluations need to be strengthened urgently. The administration should emphasize customized profession-al development and targeted training based on teacher’ s experience and professional status. Professional development should incorporate a real-world environment for the instructional design training. Scaffolding in a supportive learning community might be an effective approach to the development of teachers’ instructional design competency as well.