Direct Observation of Chloride Transfer across the Water/Organic Interface and the Transfer of Long-Chain Dicarboxylates

Yuanhua Shao,Stephen G. Weber
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9536864
1996-01-01
Abstract:We have extended the negative side of the potential window by using the organic reference electrode Ag/AgTPB and a low supporting electrolyte concentration in the aqueous phase. We have observed directly, for the first time, the voltammetric wave of chloride transferring across the water(W)/1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE) and the water/nitrobenzene (NB) interfaces. The standard potentials (and the standard Gibbs free energies of transfer) have been evaluated by consideration of half-wave potentials, the variations of the activity coefficients in both phases, and ion-pair formation. Our best estimate for the free energy of Cl- transfer to water-saturated 1,2-DCE is 45-46 kJ/mol, and for NE 38 +/- 2 kJ/mol. The Gibbs free energies of transfer of a homologous series of long-chain dicarboxylates have also been obtained for the first time. They show a similar dependence on carbon number as monocarboxylates. The transfers of the singly and doubly ionized dicarboxylic acids can also be observed simultaneously when the pH of the aqueous phase is controlled in the range of 5.5-6.6. Shorter chain dicarboxylates, such as glutarate, (OOC)-O--(CH2)(3)COO-, Cannot be transferred across either the W/1,2-DCE or W/NB interface because it is more thermodynamically uphill than the transfer of the aqueous electrolyte anion or the organic electrolyte cation. One way to overcome some of the thermodynamic barrier is to use a receptor in the organic phase that would result in facilitated transfer. Our data show that a receptor for glutarate that had a formation constant of about 10(3) for a receptor-glutarate complex would allow for facilitated transfer. Through use of literature data for the transfer of the neutral dicarboxylic acids and H+, we can estimate the difference in pK(a) values between the aqueous phase and the water-saturated nonaqueous phases. In 1,2-DCE we estimate the differences for first and second ionizations as 18.5 and 19.5, respectively, while for NE they are 13.8 and 14.4.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?