The theory of Max Weber: limitation and misuse in China

Tian Chenshan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0511-4721.2006.04.021

2006-01-01

Abstract:Weber’s “general transition theory” and the “three ideal models of authority” do not have the efficacy of reasonably explaining the present Chinese society and its political authority. In the models, “rationality” has a rather narrow sense, while the modelization of the so called “rationality-legality ideal” is to be strictly defined. In China, politics does not mean vying for power as the Westerners understand it, but is understood as the governance of things and society. The governance from a governor depends on what kind of person he is and what kind of policies he implements. In China, the law often means concrete ways or some instructive rules for managing public matters. In real experience we do not have such things as can be stated in some “ideal models.” The key point is not be rational or not, nor is it a matter of “charisma” or “rationality-legality.” The issue at the core is whether or not the persons who dominate the society seek profit as the ultimate goal of life. It is this goal that sets the modern capitalist society apart from other societies.