Abstract:Objective: To determine the effectiveness of hip arthroscopy combined with endoscopic iliotibial band (ITB) release in patients with both femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome and external snapping hip (ESH). Methods: Retrospectively review the preoperative and minimum of 2-year follow-up data of patients with both FAI syndrome and ESH who underwent endoscopic ITB release during hip arthroscopy (FAI + ESH group) from January 2014 to December 2018. The same number of age- and gender-matched FAI syndrome patients without ESH undergoing hip arthroscopy were enrolled in the control group (FAI group). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog scale for pain (VAS-pain), and abductive force of affected hip at 3 month and 2 years postoperatively were comparatively analyzed. The VAS-satisfaction score of two groups at 2 years postoperatively were also analyzed. Results: The prevalence of ESH in FAI syndrome patients undergoing hip arthroscopy in our institution was 5.5% (39 of 715 hips), including nine males (10 hips) and 29 females (29 hips). The mean age at the time of surgery was 32.1 ± 6.9 years (range, 22-48 years). According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 patients were enrolled in FAI + ITB group. Twenty-three age- and sex-matched FAI syndrome patients were enrolled in FAI group. At 24 months postoperatively, no patient still suffered ESH symptoms and painful palpation at lateral region in FAI + ITB group. The iHOT-33, mHHS, and VAS-pain score of patients in FAI + ESH group were significantly severer than patients in FAI group preoperatively (41.6 ± 7.5 vs 48.8 ± 7.2, 54.8 ± 7.2 vs 59.2 ± 6.9, 5.5 ± 0.9 vs 4.7 ± 1.0; P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in these scores between the patients in FAI + ESH group and FAI group at 3-month and 24-month follow-up (73.6 ± 8.5 vs 76.1 ± 6.9, 85.3 ± 7.8 vs 84.2 ± 6.6, 0.8 ± 0.9 vs 0.6 ± 0.9; P > 0.05). At 3 months after surgery, the abductive force of operated hip was significantly smaller than that in FAI group (82.4 ± 12.4 N vs 91.9 ± 16.1 N, P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference at 24 months after surgery (101.6 ± 14.9 N vs 106.5 ± 13.7 N, P > 0.05). The VAS-satisfaction scores of patients in the two groups were at a similarly high level (90.5 ± 6.8 vs 88.8 ± 7.3, P > 0.05). There was no complication and no arthroscopic revision in either group until 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Although abductive force recovery of the hip was delayed, hip arthroscopy combined with endoscopic ITB release addressed hip snapping in patients with both FAI syndrome and ESH, and could get similar functional improvement, pain relief, recovery speed, as well as patient satisfaction compared with the pure hip arthroscopy in FAI syndrome patients without ESH.

Iliopsoas Impingement:A Complication after Total Hip Replacement

Assessment of function and muscle strength after endoscopic iliopsoas tenotomy to treat iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty

Arthroscopic techniques for treating ilio-psoas tendinopathy after hip arthroplasty

Arthroscopic Acromioplasty for the Treatment of Impingement Syndrome of Shoulder

Satisfactory mid‐term clinical outcomes of endoscopic tenotomy for iliopsoas tendinopathy following total hip arthroplasty

Iliopsoas fibrosis after revision of total hip arthroplasty revealed by 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: a case report

Editorial Commentary: Indiscriminate Iliopsoas Tenotomy May Cause Complications-With Tight Indications and Transbursal Lengthening, We May Avoid Them

Determination of preoperative risk factors for iliopsoas tendonitis after total hip arthroplasty: A simulation study

Results of labral-level arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies for the treatment of labral impingement

Acetabular revision for iliopsoas impingement: A study of 55 cases at 3 years of follow-up. Does the procedure achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Oxford-12 score in more than 80% of cases?

How to address ischiofemoral impingement? Treatment algorithm and review of the literature

Analgesic efficacy of anterior iliopsoas muscle space block combined with local infiltration analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Revision Hip Preservation Surgery With Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement:a Report of 16 Cases

Patient-reported outcomes in total hip arthroplasty for patients with anatomically contoured femoral heads

Sequential Treatment of Iliopsoas Tendon Cysts Combined With Medial Hip Snapping by Hip Arthroscopy

Heterotopic Ossification after Arthroscopy for Hip Impingement Syndrome.

Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome with External Snapping Hip: A Comparison Study of Matched Case Series

Understanding recurrent groin pain following periacetabular osteotomy: assessment of psoas tendon mechanics using discrete element analysis

Ischiofemoral Impingement Syndrome: Clinical and Imaging/Guidance Issues with Special Focus on Ultrasonography

Total hip replacement as a revision procedure in 27 cases following artificial femoral head arthroplasty

The role of iliopsoas fractional lengthening in hip arthroscopy: a systematic review