Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effects of C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty and C2 expansive opendoor laminoplasty in upper cervical(involve or above C2 segment) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.Methods All of 39 patients (22 males and 17 females) withcervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament up to C2 which causedcompression symptoms were operated with posterior cervical surgery in ourhospital from January 2013 to June 2017.The average age was 55.74+7.91 years old,ranging from 39 to 71 years.Among these patients,21 patients underwent C2 domelike expansive laminoplasty and 18 underwent C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty,the patients in both groups underwent the C3-C7 expansive open-door laminoplasty.The preoperative and postoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI),Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score,the xisual analog scale(VAS) and the space available for the spinal cord (SAC) of C2 segment in X-ray were measured and statistically analyzed.Results All patients were followed up,the follow-up time was from 15 to 63 months (mean 42.3±17.7 months).There was no significant difference in the general condition,NDI,JOA score and JOA score improvement rate between preoperative and postoperative follow-up in 2 groups.There were significant differences in the NDI,JOA,VAS and SAC between preoperative and postoperative follow-up in 2 groups.The VAS score in C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty group 1.52± 1.2 was significantly lower than that in C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty group 2.06±0.87(t=-2.23,P＜0.05),while the SAC in C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty group 14.11±1.023 was significantly higher than that in C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty group 1 L86± 1.014(t=-6.89,P＜0.05).No failure of internal fixation or recurrent compression was found during follow-up.Conclusion For patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament up to C2 or higher level,both C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty and C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty can achieve good results.The SAC in C2 expansive open-door laminoplastygroup was superior to that in C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty group,while the postoperative pain was more obvious.There was no significant difference in postoperative neurological recovery between the two groups.Using C2 dome-like expansive laminoplasty could reduce postoperative axial pain than the C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty surgery.For patients withossified tissue in the spinal canal,which occupies more than 50％ of the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal,or with developmental spinal stenosis,C2 expansive open-door laminoplasty may berecommend to get more adequate decompression.

Early Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Open-Door Cervical Expansive Laminoplasty Plus Centerpiece Titanium Plate Fixation for Cervical Spinal Stenosis

Clinical application of a new plate fixation system in open-door laminoplasty.

A Clinical Study of C2 Dome-Like Expansive Laminoplasty and C2 Expansive Open-Door Laminoplastyinupper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

The Effect of the Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty on the Three-Dimensional Motion and Stiffness of the Cervical Spine

Effect of C-1 Single-door Laminoplasty on Symptomatic Atlas Canal Stenosis

Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty

Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty: in Situ Reconstruction of Extensor Muscle Insertion on the C2 Spinous Process Combined with Titanium Miniplates Internal Fixation

Treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminoplasty based on individual accurate transverse diameter of the spinal canal

The clinical result of unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty fixed by centerpiece plate for cervical spondylosis

Effect Observation of 92 Patients with Cervical Spinal Stenosis Treated with Expansive Laminoplasty

Clinical Outcomes of Open-Door Laminoplasty Combined with Bilateral Lateral Mass Screw Fixation for Multi-Level Cervical Spinal Stenosis with Traumatic Cervical Instability and Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study

Efficacy of Expansion of Open-door Cervical Laminoplasty Combined Foraminotomy for Coexisting Cervical Stenosis and Unilateral Radiculopathy

Expansive open-door laminoplasty for degenerative spinal stenosis in patients with multi-segmental cervical spondy-lotic myelopathy

Cervical single open-door laminoplasty with or without local lateral mass screw fixation and fusion to treat cervical spinal cord injuries accompanied by segmental spinal canal stenosis

Long-term Results of Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty of Cervical Spine

Treatment of unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty fixed by titanium miniplate for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Clinical Application of Titanium Miniplate in Cervical Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty Withmodified Centerpiece Mini-Plate Fixation and Extensor Attachment Point Reconstruction in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty with Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation and Fusion for Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: a Multi-Center Prospective Study

Posterior Cervical Open-Door Expansive Laminoplasty with Mini-Titanium Plate:Correlation Between Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Repair Effect

Estimating treatment of multilevel degenerative stenosis with traumatic instability of lower cervical spine by multi-spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction technique