Residues and Degradation Dynamics of Phoxim in Glycyrrhiza uralensis and Rhizospheric Soil in Ningxia

ZHANG Zhike,LI Shaonan,ZHANG Rong,NAN Ningli,QIAN Fengli,YANG Caixia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2010.02.011
2010-01-01
Abstract:In order to set up the safe using standard of Phoxim in Glycyrrhiza uralensis during mode planting of Glycyrrhiza uralensis,the paper used the methods of field experiment and liquid chromatography,determined the residues and degradation dynamics of Phoxim in Glycyrrhiza uralensis and rhizospheric soil.The samples was extracted with acetonitrile,purified with column chromatography and determined with ultraviolet determitor.The results showed that the minimum detemined quantity of samples was 1.00×10-9 g and the minimum determined concentration was 0.005 mg/kg with the chromatography condition the paper made.The results of different sample size showed that there were good linear relation between peak area and sample size of Phoxim in the range from 0.1 μg/mL to 10 μg/mL and the equation was Y=1.2190X+0.1658(r2=0.9940).The fortified recoveries of Phoxim in Glycyrrhiza uralensis was between 81.7% and 85.1%,RSD was between 3.39% and 5.91%.The fortified recoveries of Phoxim in soil was between 90.9% and 95.3%,and RSD was between 2.89% and 4.07%,which all conformed to the analyzing remands of pesticides residues.The results of residues indicated that the residues of Phoxim in Glycyrrhiza uralensis and soil conformed completely to the equation of first-class reaction kinetics,they were CT=1.0024e-0.1027T(r = 0.9715) and CT=0.4577e-0.0402T(r = 0.9836),respectively.The residues degradated much more quickly,the half-lives were 6.75 d and 17.24 d,respectively.The residues of Phoxim 40%(EC) in Glycyrrhiza uralensis was less than 0.05 mg/kg with recommended dosage one time in 40 d,and the residues in Glycyrrhiza uralensis and soil were all less than 0.05 mg/kg after two times spray 53 d.Therefore,we suggested that the safe interval of Phoxim 40%(EC) in Glycyrrhiza uralensis with recommended dosage one time spray should be more than 40 d and that should be more than 53 d with two times spray.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?