Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical application and biomechanical characteristics of zygomatic implant supported prosthesis (ZIP) in restoring unilateral maxillary defect and to provide theoretical support for clinical treatment.Methods:A total of 8 patients with unilateral maxillary defect admitted to the Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2016 to June 2018 were selected. Inclusion criteria: unilateral maxillary defect, 18 to 70 years old, no systemic chronic disease, no radiotherapy history, healthy residual dentition, no moderate to severe periodontitis, no loose teeth, and no obvious malocclusion. Two zygomatic implants were implanted on the affected side, and the defects were restored with removable prostheses (RP) immediately after the operation. ZIP was manufactured and placed 6-12 months after implantation. And then, the quality of life after wearing RP and ZIP was evaluated with Dental Impact on Daily Living scale (DIDL). The subjective feelings of patients were evaluated from five aspects of appearance, pain, oral comfort, eating and chewing and general performance. The results were statistically analyzed by independent sample t test. A three dimension model of skull was established with the CT data of a 25-year-old healthy male and the models of zygomatic implants and prosthesis were constructed at the same time. In this composite model, a 150 N vertical force was loaded on the occlusal surface of the prosthetic prosthesis to simulate the bite force, and the stress distribution and concentration points of the zygomatic implant, prosthetic clasps, palatal plate, abutment and other parts were analyzed. The differences between RP and ZIP restoration were compared. Results:A total of 8 patients with unilateral maxillary defect were selected, including 5 males and 3 females, aged from 18 to 63 years, with an average of 48.9 years. A total of 16 zygomatic implants were implanted in 8 patients, and ZIP repair was completed 9-10 months after operation. The result of DIDL scale showed that, in terms of appearance, oral comfort, eating and chewing, general performance, the score of ZIP group was 0.79±0.15, 0.70±0.15, 0.63±0.24, 0.73±0.13 respectively, all of which were significantly higher than those of RP group -0.41±0.22, 0.35±0.22, -0.09±0.34, 0.30±0.19 respectively. Nevertheless, the score of ZIP group in terms of pain was 0.29±0.15, which was lower than that of RP group (0.48±0.23). Except for pain, the other differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The biomechanical analysis showed that, compared with RP group, the stress of ZIP was distributed mainly in the zygomatic implants. And the stress of palatal plates, clasps and abutments was reduced significantly and distributed evenly, with no obviously stress concentration point. Conclusions:ZIP can improve appearance, reduce discomfort and increase mastication efficiency. It is a better choice for unilateral maxillary defect restoration.

Application of the prosthesis with titanium framework in the reconstruction of the unilateral maxillary defect

[Application of Computer Aided Design-Computer Aided Manufacture Technique in Mandible Defect Reconstruction with Individual Titanium Prosthesis].

Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Using Six Implants Placed Simultaneously with Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series.

Single-stage Computer-Assisted Approach for Tumour Resection and Functional Restoration of Brown Class III Maxillary Defects-Titanium Mesh and Zygomatic Implants Combined with Vascularized Anterolateral Thigh Flap.

[Reconstruction of Maxillary Defect by Prefabricated Titanium Mesh Combined with Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Flap and Bone Autograft].

Clinical Evaluation of the Obturator Prosthesis for Maxillary Defects.

Functional reconstruction of maxilla with pedicled buccal fat pad flap, prefabricated titanium mesh and autologous bone grafts.

[Clinical study of titanium mesh in conjunction with concentrate growth factors to rebuild severe bone defect of anterior maxilla]

Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Soft Lining Prosthesis for Patients with Maxillary Defects

[Application of Titanium Mesh and Free Forearm Flap for Reconstruction of Maxillary Defect Resulted from Tumor Resection].

Digital Planning Workflow for Partial Maxillectomy Using an Osteotomy Template and Immediate Rehabilitation of Maxillary Brown II Defects with Prosthesis

To Evaluate the Effect of Zygomatic Area As Bearing Seat and Zygomatic Osseointegrated Implant from Oral Cavity Ofmaxillary Obturator Prostheses by Mechanics

Rehabilitation of dentition defect with severe teeth attrition using implant-supported prosthesis combined with conventional prosthesis

Trans‐crestal dental implants in the rehabilitation of a severely atrophic maxilla: A retrospective case series

Reconstruction of maxillectomy defects

A primary study on application of the "Bi-system" iliac flap with simultaneous innervation in mandibular reconstruction

Prosthodontic rehabilitation of patients with a unilateral subtotal maxillectomy using a customised subperiosteal zygomatic implant: a post-COVID-19 mucormycosis

Computer-assisted Individualized Reconstruction of Maxillary Defect

The application of soft linging material in maxillary obturator prostheses

[Clinical Study of Prosthetic Gingival Reconstruction in Vertical Bone Defect Patients].

The effect of BioHPP versus Zirconia CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed-detachable prosthesis rehabilitating single maxillary arches on the peri-implant bone level changes