Abstract:Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Ahead of Print. Purpose:Despite advances in complex endovascular aortic repair techniques, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains a devastating complication following endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Novel strategies to preserve key intercostal/lumbar arteries have been described. We report our early results of patients who underwent direct intercostal/lumbar artery revascularization using endovascular incorporation of fenestrations/branches or extra-anatomic approaches for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repairs (FBEVARs).Materials and Methods:A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent FBEVAR with intercostal/lumbar artery revascularization from 2018 to 2022 was performed. Patient characteristics, intraoperative details, and outcomes including SCI and branch occlusions were evaluated.Results:Among 317 patients who underwent FBEVAR during the study period, 12 patients were included. Aortic pathologies consisted of degenerative aneurysms (33%), postdissection aneurysms (33%), extensive penetrating aortic ulcers with intramural hematoma (25%), and visceral patch pseudoaneurysm (8%). Full thoracoabdominal coverage was required in 8 patients and supraceliac coverage >10 cm was required in 4. Nine patients received endovascular incorporation, including directional branches (5/9), unstented fenestrations (2/9), and stented fenestration (2/9). Three patients received extra-anatomic subcutaneous femoral-to-radicular artery bypass using a composite graft of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and venous conduit. Our institutional SCI prevention protocol, consisting of prophylactic cerebral spinal fluid drain (CSFD) for high-risk patients, hemodynamic augmentation, and oxygen supplementation, was followed. Prophylactic CSFD was placed in 9 patients. One patient had unsuccessful drain placement attempts. The other 2 patients had previous unsuccessful attempts at CSFD placement. Median number of target vessels for FBEVAR was 4 with fluoroscopy time 66±31 minutes, contrast usage 109±51 ml. There were no in-hospital mortalities. Tarlov grade II SCI (ASIA grade D) were seen in 2 patients (1 endovascular and 1 extra-anatomic bypass), which resolved before discharge. At mean follow-up of 472±447 days, 3 patients had thrombosed intercostal/lumbar branches (1 extra-anatomic bypass and 2 endovascular branches) with no new SCI symptoms.Conclusions:In patients at high risk for SCI undergoing FBEVAR, direct revascularization of an intercostal or lumbar artery is feasible using endovascular or extra-anatomic bypass approach. Further studies are planned to identify key contributing segmental arteries and optimization of revascularization strategies.Clinical ImpactThis study demonstrates the feasibility of Endovascular and extra-anatomic bypass to preserve segmental artery flow, aimed at reducing the risk of spinal cord ischemia during endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repairs.

Individualized Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage for Preventing Spinal Cord Ischemia in Secondary TEVAR for Type B Dissection

Cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring and drainage in protection of spinal cord ischemia in thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair

Use of Spinal Anesthesia during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Results of adjunctive spinal drainage and/or left subclavian artery bypass in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

[New method for the intraoperative biochemical monitoring of cerebrospinal fluid in surgery of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms]

Intraoperative neuroprotective interventions prevent spinal cord ischemia and injury in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Safety and validity of selective cerebrospinal fluid drainage in open and endovascular aortic repair

Systematic review and meta-analysis of association of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage in preventing spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Spinal cord ischemia rates and prophylactic spinal drainage in patients treated with fenestrated/branched endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysms

Systematic review of the effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on outcomes after endovascular type B aortic dissection repair

Construction of a lactate-related prognostic signature for predicting prognosis after surgical repair for acute type a aortic dissection

Spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a report of four cases and review of literatures

Complications of spinal fluid drainage in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a report of 486 patients treated from 1987 to 2008

Early dynamic behavior of lactate in predicting continuous renal replacement therapy after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage during thoracic aortic repair: safety and current management

Mechanisms of Symptomatic Spinal Cord Ischemia after TEVAR: Insights from the European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications (Eurec)

Prospective randomized pilot trial comparing prophylactic vs therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid drainage during complex endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Multidisciplinary Approach to Direct Segmental Artery Revascularization to Prevent Spinal Cord Ischemia Associated With Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair

Complications of cerebrospinal fluid drainage after thoracic aortic surgery: a review of 504 patients over 5 years

Intercostal Artery Reconstruction: The Simple and Effective Technique on Spinal Cord Protection during Thoracoabdominal Aortic Replacement

A dedicated preventive protocol sustainably avoids spinal cord ischemia after endovascular aortic repair