Abstract:Under the background of frequent hostile takeover events in China and the autonomy of the articles of association, the articles of association of listed companies even set up antitakeover provisions with an excessive defense that unreasonably restricts the rights of shareholders. Based on the role orientation of innovative supervision, the Small and Medium-sized Investors Service Center (hereinafter referred to as “Investment and Service Center”) proposes to modify the relevant noncompliance provisions in the form of a shareholder recommendation letter. As the basic requirements of the articles of association and the relevant laws in corporate governance are increasingly inconsistent, the legal review of the articles of association is particularly important. This article determines the identification standard of excessive defense of antitakeover provisions by manually collecting the shareholder suggestion letter of the investment service center, the announcement on amendment of association articles of listed companies, and relevant laws and regulations. On this basis, the PSM-DID quasi-natural experimental method is used to empirically test the impact of excessive defense of antitakeover provisions on enterprise value. The study finds that the excessive defense of antitakeover provisions significantly inhibited the enterprise value. In this article, taking a-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets in 2007–2018 as an example, with the construction of antiacquisition clause excessive defense index (ATP end), relying on the “quasi-natural experiment” method of PSM-DID, we discuss the impact of excessive defense antiacquisition clause on the value of the enterprise and its impact path analysis. Further study found that its restriction mechanism was reflected in the significant increase of the first type of agency cost and the second type of agency cost. At the same time, the correlation between management compensation and performance and the correlation between management and professional performance are further reduced. Excessive defense against antiacquisition terms can reduce the corporate value, and the impact path of this effect is achieved by increasing type 1 agent costs and type 2 agent costs. It shows that the controlling shareholders are more likely to collude with the management, which aggravates the agency problem. The research conclusion of this article provides legal and economic empirical evidence for listed companies to reasonably set up antitakeover provisions and is also of great significance to innovative regulatory methods such as investment service centers. Excessive defense against antitakeover terms will enhance the dual-ditch effect and ultimately damage corporate value.

China's Anti-Takeover Legislative Policy:Foundation and Security of Shareholders Centrism

Hostile Takeover and Anti-takeover of Chinese Listed Companies Seen from the Case of Shengli Stock's Anti-takeover

On Current Status of Restraint Mechanism for Shareholders’Derivative Action in China and Countermeasures

Study on Expropriation Behavior and Negative Externality of Controlling Shareholders

Anti-takeover Measures under the New EU Company Law Directive

On the Protection of Share Repurchase Claims by Shareholders from Close Companies Limited——A Concurrent Discussion on Improving Item 4 of Article 143 in the Company Law

Value Creation and Value Capture in Corporate Governance: Using the Value-Based Approach to Analyze an Ownership Reform of China's Listed Firms

Excessive Defense of Antitakeover Provisions and Enterprise Value Based on PSM-DID Quasi-Natural Experimental Method

Review on the investors protection from perspective of the private benefits of control

Review and Outlook of Anti-takeover Devices Research

RULE FOR PREFERRED STOCK IN CHINA: OVERTHROW OF THE PRINCIPLE OF “EQUAL SHARES, EQUAL RIGHTS”? — FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

On the Effectiveness of Restricted Share Purchase by a Limited Company

Ultimate Shareholder, Government Control, and Firm Performance in China

A Review of Controlling Shareholder's Expropriation and Corporate Governance in Ownership Concentrated Market

Corporate Governance of Controlling Shareholders and Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from a Parent Board Reform in China

Experience of Internationalization of Chinese Corporate Law and Corporate Governance: How to Make the Hybrid of Civil Law and Common Law Work?

On the Abuse of Majority Decision of Capital and Its Legal Governance

On Stakeholders in Corporate Governance

Ultimate Controlling Rights and Capital Structure Policies

Policy-related Disturbance,Blockholders Counterbalance and Board Independence

China _shareholders meeting resolution flaws relief research