Abstract:From a social psychology perspective, this study explored the personal and social psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice. This study constructed a four-dimensional model of the psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice from the two dimensions of "Self vs. Society" and "Identity vs. Resource." They were Identity-Based Self-Oriented Motivation (Pacifying Outrage), Resource-Based Self-Oriented Motivation (Occupying Resource), Identity-Based Society-Oriented Motivation (Value Confirmation), and Resource-Based Society-Oriented Motivation (Deterrence and Control). In this study, 497 sets of valid data were extracted from 6 universities in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China, using 3 sets of situational experiments and the "Questionnaire Star" online survey platform as a vehicle to explore the personal motivations and psychosocial motivations of Retaliatory Justice. The empirical results showed that the situational experiment significantly verified the existence of Pacifying Outrage and Value Confirmation, and partially verified the existence of Deterrence and Control and Occupying Resource. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that only the effect of Pacifying Outrage on Retaliatory Justice showed a main effect, and the interaction between Pacifying Outrage and Deterrence and Control was not significant. Pacifying Outrage significantly affects Retaliatory Justice, while Occupying Resource significantly affects Retaliatory Justice, but the interaction between the two was not significant. Value Confirmation significantly affects Retaliatory Justice. Value Confirmation and Deterrence and Control synergistically affect Retaliatory Justice, but Deterrence and Control had no significant effect on Retaliatory Justice. Taking emotions as clues, this paper discussed the realistic value of the rheological paths of the psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice, which brought enlightenment to the improvement of social morality, the cultivation of judicial trust, and the construction of psychological service system.

An Analysis of the Causes of Unjust Cases from the View of Criminal Investigation Procedure——The influence of emotional public opinions on criminal investigation procedure

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Analysis about Reason of Deep Cognition Which Caused the Criminal Unjust Cases——in Perspective of Criminal Trial

On the difficult case caused by subject in criminal investigation

Research on the Online Live Broadcasts of Criminal Trial: An Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaire Survey

A Research on the Effect of Public Opinion on Judicial Fairness in Criminal Cases

Measuring Public-Involving Economic Crime: A Case Study in Beijing, China

Probing into the Risks in Criminal Investigations

On the Influence of Judges' Feeling Factors in Criminal Trail

Demonstrative Study on Present Anglo-American Misjudged Criminal Cases

Basic Principles of Law and the Sentencing Decisions of Ordinary Citizens：The Evidence f rom the Experiment

On Criminal Justice Process: a Legal-Sociological Analysis on a Case

Errors in Criminal Scene Investigation and Misjudged Cases

CASE STUDY ON THE CAUSES OF WRONGFUL CONVICTION IN CHINESE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Hard Cases,Judicial Decisions and the Weight among Substantive-Factors

How Chinese Citizens Feel about the Injustice——A Case Study

Research on the Mechanism of Unreasonable Objective Attribution

Analysis of personal psychological motivation and social psychological motivation of Retaliatory Justice under moral public opinion: Chinese cases

Examining the Determinants of Prosecution Decisions of Intimate Partner Violence: An Exploratory Analysis of Chinese Data