First‘egocentric'then‘adjustment':The process of adults'reasoning about other's mental states

Chen Yulu,Su Yanjie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2011.01.047
IF: 10.172
2011-01-01
Psychological Science
Abstract:When reasoning about other's mental states,adults sometimes would behave in an egocentric way,as the young children who cannot pass the theory of mind tasks before the age of four or five always do.The study conducted two experiments,each of which introduced a complicated theory of mind task adapted from the classic tasks,examining perspective-taking and false-belief reasoning respectively.We aimed to compare adult participants' egocentric behaviors under time pressure and those performed leisurely,when reasoning about others' mental states.Experiment 1 used a referential communication task simulated on a computer to explore adults' visual perspective-taking.Participants were directed by a virtual cartoon character to fetch a object around a 3×3 array of boxas on the computer screen.The participant and the cartoon director were seated face to face with the array set between them. Some of the objects were occluded from the director by a slat but still observable to the participants,creating a discrepancy in their visual perspective.24 adults participated in experiment 1 and each of them finished two trials.In time limited trial,participants must respond within 2 seconds,and in time unlimited trial,participants could take as long time as they needed to make a response.Results showed that adults were more likely to ignore other's different perspective under time pressure(18.3%egocentric mistakes) than those without time limit(2.5%egocentric mistakes),t(23) = 4.389,p<.001.Experiment 2 used an unexpected location task for adults to explore false-belief reasoning.Participants were asked to give estimated the probability that the ignorant character with a false belief would first search a bag,which the participants knew the target object was in,and another probability of another bag,which the participants knew the target object was not in.24 of the total 76 participants(false-belief time limited group) must respond within 7.5 seconds,25 of them(false-belief time unlimited group) could contemplate as long as they wanted,and the other 27 participants (true-belief time unlimited group,as the baseline) would estimate the possibility that the character's belief was the same as the participants'.The results of Experiment 2 showed that participants tended to think the ignorant character as more likely to search the bag actually containing the object when the time was limited(49.6%) than when it was not(28.6%),t(47) = 2.532,p<.05. Together,the results of the two experiments showed that adults were more egocentric under time pressure than not.Our findings support the‘egocentric-adjustment' assumption about the process of reasoning about others' mental states when there is a discrepancy between self and other's mental states:first,people will begin the reasoning with an egocentric anchoring by adopting their own mental states;then,they will turn to an adjustment to overcome egocentrism until they reach others' mental states.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?