Abstract:ABSTRACT During prolonged resource limitation, bacterial cells can persist in metabolically active states of non-growth. These maintenance periods, such as those experienced in stationary phase, can include upregulation of secondary metabolism and release of exometabolites into the local environment. As resource limitation is common in many environmental microbial habitats, we hypothesized that neighboring bacterial populations employ exometabolites to compete or cooperate during maintenance and that these exometabolite-facilitated interactions can drive community outcomes. Here, we evaluated the consequences of exometabolite interactions over the stationary phase among three environmental strains: Burkholderia thailandensis E264, Chromobacterium subtsugae ATCC 31532 , and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. We assembled them into synthetic communities that only permitted chemical interactions. We compared the responses (transcripts) and outputs (exometabolites) of each member with and without neighbors. We found that transcriptional dynamics were changed with different neighbors and that some of these changes were coordinated between members. The dominant competitor B. thailandensis consistently upregulated biosynthetic gene clusters to produce bioactive exometabolites for both exploitative and interference competition. These results demonstrate that competition strategies during maintenance can contribute to community-level outcomes. It also suggests that the traditional concept of defining competitiveness by growth outcomes may be narrow and that maintenance competition could be an additional or alternative measure. IMPORTANCE Free-living microbial populations often persist and engage in environments that offer few or inconsistently available resources. Thus, it is important to investigate microbial interactions in this common and ecologically relevant condition of non-growth. This work investigates the consequences of resource limitation for community metabolic output and for population interactions in simple synthetic bacterial communities. Despite non-growth, we observed active, exometabolite-mediated competition among the bacterial populations. Many of these interactions and produced exometabolites were dependent on the community composition but we also observed that one dominant competitor consistently produced interfering exometabolites regardless. These results are important for predicting and understanding microbial interactions in resource-limited environments.

How small can the difference among competitors be for coexistence to occur

Interactions in the Competitive Coexistence Process of Streptomyces Sp. and Escherichia Coli

Coexistence of competing metabolic pathways in well-mixed populations

Fate of a mutant emerging at the initial stage of evolution

Competitive Interactions Between Incompatible Mutants of the Social Bacterium Myxococcus xanthus DK1622

Mathematical Model Allowing the Coexistence of Closely Related Competitors at the Initial Stage of Evolution

Evolution Alters Ecological Mechanisms of Coexistence in Experimental Microcosms

Plasmid-bearing, Plasmid-Free Organisms Competing for Two Complementary Nutrients in a Chemostat.

Coexistence of Competing Microbial Strains under Twofold Environmental Variability and Demographic Fluctuations

Coexisting ecotypes in long-term evolution emerged from interacting trade-offs

Competition Between Two Similar Species in the Unstirred Chemostat

Microbial Competition among Anammox Bacteria in Nitrite-Limited Bioreactors.

Phenotypic responses to interspecies competition and commensalism in a naturally-derived microbial co-culture

Competition Between Microorganisms for a Single Limiting Resource with Cell Quota Structure and Spatial Variation

Low-level resource partitioning supports coexistence among functionally redundant bacteria during successional dynamics

Spatial scales of competition and a growth–motility trade-off interact to determine bacterial coexistence

Resolving the conflict between antibiotic production and rapid growth by recognition of peptidoglycan of susceptible competitors

Bioactive exometabolites drive maintenance competition in simple bacterial communities

Competition-cooperation mechanism between Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus based on systems mapping

Metabolic dissimilarity determines the establishment of cross-feeding interactions in bacteria

Lab study on the interspecific competition between two common freshwater plankton species