Comparative Study on Different Method Judging Catheterization Intermittent for Patients with Neurogenic Bladder and Spinal Injury

ZHANG Ling-zhi,WANG Yuan-jiao,SUN Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9875.2012.07.003
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the judging method of catheterization intermittent for patients with neurogenic bladder and spinal injury to provide evidence for find out appropriate catheterization intermittent.Method Divide 72 patients with spinal injury into control group(n=40) and observation group(n=32) according to hospitalization order.Judge catheterization intermittent by residual urine volume for control group and by urine volume method for observation group.Assess patients' quality of life before and 2 months after experiment by World Health Organization's Quality of Life(WHOQOL).Monitor bladder function of two groups 2 months after experiment.Result Scores of physical and mental,general health and general quality of life from WHOQOL are obviously higher in observation group.Function of bladder of observation group is better than control group.Conclusion Urine volume judgment is a better method for judging catheterization intermittent for patients with neurogenic bladder and spinal injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?