Comparative Research on Water Resource Management Between Australia and China

WEI Yongping,John Langford,XIA Jun,ZHAN Chesheng,LIU Wenhua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2009.09.002

2009-01-01

Abstract:Water is a scarce resource in many parts of the world and its management is a particularly significant challenge for both Australia and China. A comparative perspective on water reso.urces management between Australia and China is developed in this paper. We concluded that there are some similarities in the nature of water resources in Australia and China. These include similar mean annual rainfalls and high spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and runoff. Irrigated agriculture is the largest water user, accounting for 70% of total annual water withdrawals. Both surface and ground water have been over-exploited, which have resulted in environmental degradation. Because of the large difference in populations a distinct difference between the two countries occurs in per capita water availability.Despite similarities in water resource issues Australia and China are very different in terms of water resource management practices and institutions. Australia has relatively simple water governance in which the Basin Authority through partnership arrangements plays very important roles in water resources management. In contrast, China has a hierarchical water governance system, in which the top-down approach and cross-department coordination are predominant. In both irrigation water management and catchment management Australia has put emphasis on the system approach in which the engineering, technological, economic and institutional measures are included as integrative mechanisms to manage water resources. In contrast China attaches greater importance to engineering and technological measures, although future targets of economic and institutional reforms have been formulated. This difference in emphasis on water resource management results in different research priorities on water resources in both countries over the next few years. The research priority in Australia is linked to policy and management and this contrasts with the technology development and engineering construction emphasis in China.Many of the issues being faced by China would seem to be amenable to the type of reforms being pursued in Australia. China can benefit from sharing Australia' s experiences in systems thinking in relation to water resources management, it includes a whole-of-system approach for improving irrigation water use efficiency, a whole-of-catchment approach for catchment management and a linkage between science and policy/management. While China can learn the system thinking from Australia's lessons on water resources management, some common challenges face both countries including addressing climate change, improving water productivity while restoring agro-ecosystem, and understanding interdependency between surface water and groundwater.