Perfect Worlds: Utopian Fiction in China and the West by Douwe Fokkema (review)
Rudolphus Teeuwen
2015-04-17
Abstract:Douwe Fokkema’s Perfect Worlds begins with four hypotheses about utopian fiction. The first is that moments of crisis, “when dominant ideologies can no longer answer the needs of the day” (16), create favorable cultural conditions for the production and reception of utopian genres; the second, that “we will see an upsurge of utopian narratives among writers who have emancipated themselves from revealed religion” (19); the third, that the closer we are to the realization of “eutopian” principles, “the greater the chance that we will see an increase of dystopian writing that aims to expose the adverse results of any good intention” (21). The final of the four hypotheses, the one that represents the most illuminating and original aspect of this big book, is that “Chinese and European utopian fictions have gone through opposite historical developments” (26). These hypotheses come at the heels of a yet earlier declaration in the book’s preface, namely, that Fokkema intends to limit himself to a discussion of utopia as a fictional and literary genre, and not as a genre of politics (or, one might add, philosophy, sociology, or ecology). A literary scholar’s attention, he explains, falls on narration rather than exposition, with narration having “cognitive and emotive effects . . . on the reader’s mind [that] differ from those of predominantly rational expositions” (5). As it turns out, the book is much less thesis-driven than its opening pages suggest. We really only hear of those hypotheses again in the concluding chapter, where their formulation is a bit sheepishly admitted to have been “vague to an extent that almost prevented their refutation” (399). “Refutation” (the term a salute to Karl Popper, whose search for black swans Fokkema in much of his distinguished career tried to apply to literary studies but whom he, in this book, finds wanting for his lack of “affinity with literature” [47])
Sociology,Philosophy