Abstract:Framing Effects can be found in all kinds of human judgment and decision making areas,from medical choices to commercial decisions to gambling.Recent work in moral psychology suggests that moral judgments are influenced by factors most people would deem irrelevant,such as wording effect,in which hypothetical moral scenarios are presented. But studies of moral judgment influenced by framing effects are still inadequate.To narrow down the research gaps,two scenarios were used to investigate how moral judgments are affected by positive and negative frames.The main object of the study was to explore how different description of the same moral scenari-os impact individual's moral judgment,individual's evaluating of the blamable of the choice of the scenario's protagonist and the gen-der differences about the framing effects of moral judgment.The used two scenarios were classic Asian disease and factory disturbance situation.The two scenarios were selected because they were belonged to true frame which defined by Frisch.The two scenarios were presented in positive or negative frame,after each scenario there were two solutions,certainty or risky solution,for subjects to choose. Then there were four questions for participants to answer.Using factory disturbance situation as an example,the four questions were:"Which solution would you like to choose?","Which solution do you think violates moral principle more badly?","Assuming that the workers have chosen plan A,do you think their behavior should be condemned?",and"Assuming that the workers have chosen plan B, do you think their behavior should be condemned?".The former two questions were answered according to two alternatives forced choice (plan A or B),the last two questions were answered through three Likert options(1=should not,2=not sure,3=ought to).600 col-lege students were asked to decide which solution they would like to select,to judge which solution is worse from a moral point of view, and to decide which action is more blamable if the protagonist of the scenario had chosen certainty or risky solution.Results showed that when confronted with moral judgment situations,college students tend to choose certainty solution if the scenarios were presented in pos-itive frame,and tend to choose risky solution if the scenarios were presented in negative frame.When the scenarios were presented in positive frame,subjects judged the risky solution was worse than the certainty solution.Whilst when the scenarios were presented in neg-ative frame,subjects judged the certainty solution was worse than the risky solution.The judgments about the condemnable of the protag-onist who had chosen the certainty or risky solution were different from the judgments of the violation of morality of the solution.When the scenarios were presented in positive frame,if the protagonist had chosen risky solution,his or her action was more blamable than if he or she had chosen certainty solution.But when the scenarios were presented in negative frame,subjects judged protagonist's risky so-lution as blamable as certainty solution.We also found that there were gender differences about the framing effects of moral judgment, females were more risk seeking than males in negative moral frame.

A New Perspective on Framing,Agenda Setting,and Priming

The Study of Cognitive Mechanism of Framing Effect:A Priority Heuristic Perspective

The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited

On the Practice of Framing Theory in Journalism and Communication Studies

A Study Media Coverage of College Crisis under Framing Theory

Framing: Equivalency

The Theories and Methods of Money Priming Research

Framing as a Bridging Concept for Climate Change Communication: A Systematic Review Based on 25 Years of Literature

Praxis and Theory Combined: Introduction to "new Perspectives on New Media''

Influence of Message Framing on Attitude toward Advertisement:The Mediating Effects of Argument Strength

Power from Words: the Influence of Brand Activism Message Framing on Consumer Purchase Intention

Framing Effects within Moral Judgments:A New Perspective

Priming Research in Social Psychology: Approaches and Challenges

Recent Development in the Research on Affective Priming

A Socio-cognitive Discourse Analysis Framework:A Case Study of Evidentiality in News Discourse

Three levels of framing

The framing of power in communicative planning theory: Analysing the work of John Forester, Patsy Healey and Judith Innes

Metacognition: A New Perspective on Attitude and Persuasion Study

Why it is good to communicate the bad: understanding the influence of message framing in persuasive communication on consumer decision-making processes

From conflict to dialoguen

A Dialogue with McCombs: History, Now and Future of Agenda-setting Theory Research