Chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in 26 cases of gynecologic malignant oncology patients with hepatitis B virus carrier

Zhao Lijun,Li Na,Li Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2013.10.008
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To study the chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in 26 cases of gynecologic malignant oncology patients with hepatitis B virus carrier. Methods:26 cases of gynecologic malignant cancer with hepatitis B virus carrier admitted were enrolled in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Peking University People's Hospital from May 2007to Dec. 2011. HBV-DNA,liver function test and a routine blood test were detected before and after chemotherapy. Results: Within 26 cases,HBV-DNA was not detected before and after chemotherapy in 16 cases. In the other 10 cases,HBV-DNA was positive before chemotherapy in 2 cases and negative in 8 cases. There was 1 case with HBV-DNA copies increased after chemotherapy,whose liver function was normal and HBV-DNA declined after received antiviral and protection of liver function in the treatment. In 2 cases whose HBV-DNA was positive,liver function was normal with no bone marrow suppression in one case. While in another case liver function was abnormal with severe bone marrow suppression and it could be recovery after given antiviral and protective liver treatment. The liver functions of 26 cases were all normal before chemotherapy. Liver functions of 5 cases( 19. 23%) appeared abnormal after chemotherapy mainly including transaminase level anomalies. There were 58 times bone marrow suppression appeared in 177 times chemotherapy. There were no significant difference in chemotherapy regimens,chemotherapy doses and chemotherapy treatment course between the patients appeared liver function damage after chemotherapy and the patients with no liver function damage after chemotherapy. Conclusion: There is chemotherapy-induced Hepatitis B virus( HBV) reactivation effects on the gynecological malignant cancer patients with hepatitis B virus carrier. Antiviral treatment should be given when protective liver therapy alone is invalid.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?