Abstract:The tumor suppressor p53 is required for induction of its downstream effector genes such as GADD45 and CIP1/WAF1 by ionizing radiation (IR), This response is probably mediated through defined p53 binding sites located in the promoter of CIP1/WAF1 and in the third intron of GADD45. In contrast, the gadd gene stress response to base-damaging agents, such as methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) or UV radiation, or medium depletion (starvation) occurs in all mammalian cells examined to date regardless of p53 status for both GADD45 and also GADD153, which is not IR-responsive in many lines with functional p53, These agents strongly induce the p53 protein and raise the possibility that, although p53 is not required for the typical ''gadd'' response to these agents, p53 may contribute to these non-IR stress responses, This possibility was confirmed by the finding that disruption of p53 function by transfection with dominant-negative vectors expressing HPV E6, mutant p53, or SV40 T Ag reduced the induction of GADD45 and GADD153 as measured by increases in mRNA and protein levels in human lines with wild-type p53, Similarly, induction of these genes by MMS or UV radiation was consistently stronger in the parental mouse embryo fibroblasts compared to cells derived from mice where both p53 alleles had been deleted, Similar qualitative responses were also seen for CIP1/WAF1. In agreement with reduced induction of p53-regulated genes, the G(1) checkpoint activated by MMS or UV radiation was markedly abrogated in p53-wt human MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells by E6 expression, Interestingly, induction of reporter constructs driven by the GADD45 or GADD153 promoters was substantially reduced in human cells transfected with mutant p53 or E6 expression vectors or in cells lacking p53 following treatment with MMS, UV radiation, or starvation, Because neither promoter is inducible by IR, and neither contains a strong p53 binding site, these results indicate that p53 has a synergistic or cooperative role in these non-IR stress responses for both GADD45 and GADD153, and that this role is not mediated through identifiable p53-binding sites.

Myc Suppresses Induction of the Growth Arrest Genes Gadd34, Gadd45, and Gadd153 by DNA-damaging Agents

The Gadd and MyD Genes Define a Novel Set of Mammalian Genes Encoding Acidic Proteins That Synergistically Suppress Cell Growth.

The Gadd45 Inhibition Of Cdc2 Kinase Correlates With Gadd45-Mediated Growth Suppression

Abrogation Of P53 Function Affects Gadd Gene Responses To Dna Base-Damaging Agents And Starvation

c-Myc suppression of DNA double-strand break repair.

Similarity Of The Dna-Damage Responsiveness And Growth-Suppressive Properties Of Waf1/Cip1 And Gadd45

Abstract 2955: C-Myc Suppresses DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

The Stress-Responsive Gene Gadd45g Is A Functional Tumor Suppressor, With Its Response To Environmental Stresses Frequently Disrupted Epigenetically In Multiple Tumors

Regulation of c-Myc protein stability by proteasome activator REG γ

Mammalian GADD34, an Apoptosis- and DNA Damage-inducible Gene*

Transcriptional Activation of MYC-Induced Genes by GCN5 Promotes B-cell Lymphomagenesis

Evidence for Distinct Kinase-Mediated Pathways in Gadd Gene Responses.

The Central Region of Gadd45 is Required for Its Interaction with P21/waf1.

Activation of Gadd34 by Diverse Apoptotic Signals and Suppression of Its Growth Inhibitory Effects by Apoptotic Inhibitors

Transcription factors Oct-1 and NF-YA regulate the p53-independent induction of the GADD45 following DNA damage

Tumor Suppressor P53 Can Participate in Transcriptional Induction of the GADD45 Promoter in the Absence of Direct DNA Binding

Induction of Cellular P53 Activity by DNA-Damaging Agents and Growth Arrest

Induction by Ionizing Radiation of the Gadd45 Gene in Cultured Human Cells: Lack of Mediation by Protein Kinase C.

Gadd45a Function in Suppressing Cell Transformation and Tumor Malignancy

Direct Interaction of C-Myc with Smad2 and Smad3 to Inhibit TGF-β-Mediated Induction of the CDK Inhibitor P15ink4b

ATF3 Induction Following DNA Damage is Regulated by Distinct Signaling Pathways and Over-Expression of ATF3 Protein Suppresses Cells Growth