EFFECTS OF SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE ON ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES IN CTENOPHARYNGODON IDELLUS
DING Shi-Hua,SUN Han-Chang,CHEN Da-Qing,HUANG Li-Ying,GENG Xiao-Xiu,ZHANG Ya-Fei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2006.02.003
2006-01-01
Abstract:The environmental risk of anionic surfactants has become a topic of concern, which have been realized and assessed in biological toxicity in recent years. A large number of studies have investigated the toxic effects of various environmental contaminants on fish. Most of previous investigations focused on demonstrating the toxicity and toxicological mechanism of heavy metals, inorganic nitric compounds and organic contaminants. Unlike the constant control of some other contaminants, surfactant contaminants are still be released to water environment in millions of tons every year. Recently, increasing studies have been carried out to reveal the effects of anionic surfactants on fish viability, reproductivity, avoidance response and other functions. However, few reports were involved in the impacts of anionic surfactants on fish antioxidant enzymes. In this study, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was used as a reference anionic surfactant to evaluate the effects of anionic surfactants. Fish samples were juvenile grass carps in almost identical size. An acute toxicity test showed that the 96h LC_ 50 of SDS to grass carp was 5.2mg/L. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) were determined in grass carp after exposures in three concentrations (0.01, 0.20 and 4.0 mg/L) of SDS for 10 days. The exposure effectiveness was judged by the change of enzyme activity. Determination of SOD in muscle, plasma and liver and GSH-Px in gills, plasma and red cells indicated that SDS exposure resulted in changes in enzyme activity. Compared to the controls, the activities of both enzymes in all tested tissues were ineuced in early stages of the exposure, and then the enzyme activities decreased with increase of SDS concentration as the exposure time extended, suggesting that the enzyme activities correlated to the SDS concentration and the exposure time. Our data also revealed that the distribution of both antioxidant enzymes were different in various tissues. The highest activities of SOD and GSH-Px were found in red cells and liver, respectively, which were easy to detect and sensitive to SDS exposure. As a conclusion, we believed that exposure to SDS could cause a significant toxic effect on grass carp, and the SDS pollutant menace in water environment showed negative effect on SOD in liver and GSH-Px in red cells.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?