Comparison of Two Sentinel Node Detection Methods in Tongue Cancer Patients with Clinically NO Neck

PENG Han-wei,GUO Zhu-ming,ZENG Zong-yuan,ZHANG Quan,WANG Shun-lan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3244.2007.05.005
2007-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE: This study was designed to screen out an optimal method for detection of sentinel nodes (SN) in tongue cancer patients with clinically N0 neck (cN0) and to compare the practical value of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with intraoperative blue dye mapping and intraoperative detection with a γ-probe. METHODS: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with intraoperative blue dye mapping (group A) and intraoperative detection with γ-probe (group B) were employed to detect sentinel nodes in 20 cases of clinically N0 tongue cancer,respectively. Routine pathological examination of the cervical specimen and lymph node metastasis developed during follow-up were set as golden standard to assess the efficacy of SN biopsy with these two methods in evaluating cervical lymph node status. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 12.0 software package,Chi-square test being used in ratio comparison. RESULTS: In group A,SNs were detected in all 20 cases and occult cervical lymph node metastases were found in 25% of the cases (5/20); when SN biopsy was used to evaluate cervical status,the accuracy rate was 95% and the negative predictive value was 94%,with 1 false negative case in this group. In group B,SNs were detected in 19 cases out of 20 cases,with a detection rate of 95%,and occult cervical lymph node metastases were found in 15% of the cases (3/20); the accuracy rate and negative predictive value of SN biopsy were equally 84%,with false negative in 3 cases. CONCLUSION: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with intraoperative blue dye mapping is a valuable and convenient method for SN detection in tongue cancer when compared with intraoperative γ probe detection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?