The Removal of Typical UV Filters in Urban Wastewater Reclamation Plant

MA Yong-min,QU Zhi-hua,LIU Ke-ming,LI Wei-hong,GUO Chang-sheng,WANG Yu-qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5897.2006.03.014
2006-01-01
Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
Abstract:Recently, there is increasing public concern about the secondary effects of personal care products, as ingredients of these products may enter the aquatic environment and reach detectable and potentially harmful concentrations. In this paper, concentrations of four typical UV filters including ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate(EHMC),benzophenone-3(BP-3),4-methylben-zoylmethane(4-MBC),octocrylene(OC)were examined in each treatment process of the wastewater reclamation plant(WWRP)located in Tianjin. The solid phase extraction(SPE),gas chromatographic(GC),and mass spectrometric analyses(MS)were used for the separation and determination of UV filters. All four UV filters were detected in the influent during the three sampling campaigns(February, July and September),and the concentrations ranged from 34ng·L-1 to 2128ng·L-1. The concentrations of the four UV filters are higher in July and September than that in February. The removal efficiencies ranged from 8% to 21% for the selected UV filters during coagulation-flocculation treatment. The ozonation treatment achieved the maximum removal(16%~29%),on the contrary, the continuous microfiltration(CMF)achieved the minimal removal(3.6%~8.5%). The total removal efficiencies varied from 28.3% to 43.1%. These results indicated that the UV filters were not completely removed during WWRP treatment and may be carried over into the aquatic environment. Reclaimed water must be carefully planned and regulated to prevent adverse health effects and ensure safe water reuse.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?