Comparative Study of Transcatheter Intervention of VSD with Large Sack with Thin-Waist-big-side Occluder and Symmetrical Occluder

李寰,李军,张军,张玉顺,胡涛,范延红,李家一,代政学,王海昌
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2009.06.002
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of transcatheter intervention of VSD with large sack thin-waist-big-side with VSD occluder or with symmetrical occluder.Methods One hundred and thirty two patients(59 males,73 females)aged from 2 to 49,were diagnosed with VSD with large sack by echocardiogram and left ventriculography and all the patients underwent transcatheter occlusion from Aug.2004 to Dec.2008.The mean size of the VSD in left ventricular side was 13.8±4.5(range from 10 to 24)mm.The patients were divided into the thin-waist-big-side occluder group and the symmetricl occluder group according to occluder type used.Echocardiogram and ECG were examined during the follow-up.Results Fifty eight patients(23 males,aged 12.8±10.9(range from 2 to 32)were treated with thin-waist-big-side occluder and the diameter of the occludes ranged from 6 to 16 mm.Seventy four patients(36 males,aged 15.4±10.8 years old,range from 2 to 49 years old)were treated with symmetrical occluders and the diameter of the occluder ranged from 6 to 24 mm.After the follow-up of 3-6 months,the incidences of residual shunt(3.4% vs 4.1%),new on-set of tricuspid valve regurgitation(5.2% vs 5.4%)and aortic valve regurgitation(3.4 vs 6.8%)and the incidence of right ventricular outflow tract stenosis(3.4 vs 5.4%)had no significant differences between the 2 group(P0.05).There was also no significant differences in ECG changes between the 2 group(P0.05).Conclusions Transcatheter intervention of VSD with large sack both thin-waist-big-side occluder or symmetrical occluder showed satisfactory result.Attention should be paid in the indications of these 2 types of occluders.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?