Abstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Color matching in restorative and prosthetic dentistry is important for the success of dental treatments, although communication with the dental laboratory remains subjective, and studies of the performance of objective communication methods are lacking.PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate color differences (ΔE) and compare color luminosity (L*) values among different types of digital photography equipment used to document tooth color, with and without a gray reference card, and to determine whether the gray card could be used to standardize color assessment in dental photography.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty photographs were made (n=10) using different equipment: a D7000 digital camera (Nikon Corp) with an 85-mm lens and wireless close-up flash (DC+WCF); close-up flash surrounded by 80 grams per square meter (gsm; specification of paper thickness) white printing paper (DC+WPP); ring flash (DC+RF); close-up flash attached to a dual-point rigid flash bracket (DC+DPRF); cross-polarizing filter attached to a close-up flash (DC+CPF); and iPhone 7 (I7). For all photographs, a gray reference card with known color values was positioned at the patients' mandibular teeth, acting as a parameter for the analysis of white-balanced digital photographs. Each photograph underwent white balance with the reference card and software. ΔE were obtained from each piece of equipment by comparing images with and without white balance (original photo) with software and the smallest ΔE achieved was used as the gold standard for comparisons of luminosity. Values of luminosity were subsequently obtained for the different equipment with and without white balancing the photographs; these values were compared using a general estimating equation with Huber-White standard error (α=.05).RESULTS: The use of a cross-polarizing filter was used as the gold standard for luminosity evaluation, as the smallest ΔE (3.4) among photographs were observed when those with and without white balance were compared. Luminosity results from the cross-polarizing filter method (DC+CPF) were not significantly different from those of the DC+DPRF (P=.73), DC+WPP (P=.106), and DC+WCF (P=.551) groups but were statistically different from DC+RF (P=.028) and I7 groups (P<.001). Use of a gray card was significant when a ring flash (P=.008) or the iPhone (P=.023) were used but not statistically significant for the other groups (P>.05).CONCLUSIONS: The use of a cross-polarizing filter results in more color-standardized photographs, while the ring flash system and the iPhone 7 result in less standardized photographs. The gray reference card had a significant effect when a ring flash system or iPhone 7 was used.

Comparison and Analysis of Camera Flash Illumination in Forensic Photography

Analysis of flash lamp structure using Monte Carlo photon tracing method

Image Forensics Technology Using Abnormity of Local Hue for Blur Detection

Analysis of Structure Design of Flashlight Using Monte Carlo Photon Tracing Method

Research of diffraction effect in compressive sensing ghost imaging

Surgical lighting with contrast enhancement based on spectral reflectance comparison and entropy analysis.

Routine Photography of Injuries: A Comparison Between Smartphone Cameras and Digital Single-Lens Camera-A Pilot Study

Investigation of self-adaptive LED surgical lighting based on entropy contrast enhancing method

Forensic Photography Concepts and Applications for Better Crime Scene Examination

Forensic Camera Identification: Effects of Off-Nominal Exposures

[Between clinical and forensic imaging : Differences, similarities and legal framework]

Forensic imaging: a powerful tool in modern forensic investigation

Analyzing the Effects of Stray Light to Different Critical Dimension Based on Kirk Test

Digital photography with flash and no-flash image pairs

Illuminant Spectra-Based Source Separation Using Flash Photography

[Forensic imaging of sharp force injuries]

An image forensic technique based on 2D lighting estimation using spherical harmonic frames

Visual Color Comparisons in Forensic Science

Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card

Visible and near-infrared chemical imaging methods for the analysis of selected forensic samples

Comparison of fundus autofluorescence images acquired by the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (488 nm excitation) and the modified Topcon fundus camera (580 nm excitation)