Abstract:This study was designed to investigate the effects of the maturational age of recipient oocytes and activation time after fusion on the developmental abilities of buffalo nuclear transfer (NT) reconstructed embryos. Buffalo oocytes matured in vitro for 22 h were enucleated by micromanipulation using the Spindle View system. Fetal fibroblasts, pretreated with 0.1 μg/mL aphidicolin for 24 h, followed by culture for 48 h in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Media (DMEM) supplemented with 0.5% fetal bovine serum, were electrofused to enucleated oocytes. The reconstructed embryos were activated chemically by exposure to 5 mM ionomycin for 5 min and 2 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for 3 h. In the experiment 1: to determine the effect of maturational age of oocytes on the development of parthenogenetic embryos, the buffalo oocytes of 28 to 32 h after mature (ham) were used for parthenogenetic activation (PA). In the experiment 2: to examine if the maturational age of recipient oocytes affects the development of NT embryos, fetal fibroblasts were electrofused with enucleated oocytes of 25, 26, 27 or 28 ham, respectively, and reconstructed oocytes were activated chemically at 3h after fusion, these experiment groups were respectively named as F25A28, F26A29, F27A30 and F28A31. In the experiment 3: to seek for the optimal duration of exposure of the donor nucleus to recipient cytoplasm after fusion, NT oocytes fused at 27 ham were activated chemically at 1 (F27A28), 2 (F27A29), 3 (F27A30) or 4 (F27A31) h after fusion (haf), respectively. Moreover, the in vivo developmental potential of NT embryos derived from different activation time after fusion was evaluated. The results showed that the proportion of parthenogenetic embryos from the oocytes of 30 ham developing to blastocysts was higher than that of embryos from the oocytes of 32 ham (31.3% vs.19.9%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the fusion rate of the embryos that reconstructed from enucleated oocytes of 25, 26, 27 or 28 ham (90.3%, 91.5%, 90.1% and 91.4%, respectively). The cleavage rate (78.0%) and the blastocyst development rate (18.1%) of reconstructed embryos from the donor nucleus fusing with oocytes of 27 ham group were significantly higher than the cleavage rate of reconstructed embryos from oocytes of 28 ham group (67.2%) and blastocyst development rate of the reconstructed embryos from oocytes of 25 ham (7.4%) and 26 ham (8.5%) groups, respectively (P < 0.05). A higher proportion of reconstructed embryos activated at 3 haf was found to develop to blastocyst stage (18.6%), in comparison with that of the embryos activated at 1 (6.0%), 2 (8.3%) and 4 (10.6%) haf groups (P < 0.05). No recipient was observed to be pregnant on day 60 after received the cloned blastocysts derived from the embryos activated at 1 (pregnancy/transfers, 0/8), 2 (pregnancy/transfers, 0/10) and 4 (pregnancy/transfers, 0/9) haf, respectively. Three out of sixteen pregnancies (pregnancy/transfers, 3/16) were established on day 60 after transferring blastocysts developed from the embryos activated at 3 haf, and only two of these pregnancies maintained to term. The present study demonstrated that the developmental potential of buffalo reconstructed embryos was affected by the maturational age of recipient oocytes and activation time after fusion. The donor nucleus fusing with enucleated oocytes of 27 ham and holding in the recipient cytoplasts for 3h between fusion and activation was beneficial to the development of buffalo nuclear tranfer embryos from fetal fibroblasts. (poster)

81 COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENTAL ABILITY AMONG CLONED EMBRYOS WITH VARIOUS INDIVIDUAL RECIPIENT CYTOPLASMS IN BOVINE

The Developmental Competence of Bovine Nuclear Transfer Embryos Derived from Cow Versus Heifer Cytoplasts

76 PRODUCTION OF CLONED BOVINE TRANSGENIC EMBRYOS WITH VARIOUS TYPES OF MONO-COLONY CELLS AND OVUM PICKUP

65 CLONED EMBRYOS FROM HORSE SOMATIC CELLS AND ENUCLEATED BOVINE AND OVINE OOCYTES AND THEIR DEVELOPMENTAL COMPETENCE

Cloned calves produced by nuclear transfer from cultured cumulus cells

Somatic Cell Bovine Cloning: Effect of Donor Cell and Recipients

P-1012

Colcemid-Treated Heifer Cytoplasts Improved in Vitro and in Vivo Cloned Embryo Development

Effect of individual heifer oocyte donors on cloned embryo development in vitro.

Development of Embryos Reconstructed from Different Age of Recipient Oocytes and Activation Time after Fusion of Fetal Fibroblasts in Buffalo (bubalus Bubalis) Nuclear Transfer

Effects of Different Source of Donor Cells on Buffalo Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer

Effect of Type of The Donor Cell on The Development of Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transplantation Reconstituted Embroys

Effects of Different Donor Cells on the Development of Nuclear- Trans-Ferred Porcine Embryos

Effect of Oocyte Mitochondrial Dna Haplotype on Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Efficiency

Effects of different donor cells and passages on the development of nuclear transfer porcine embryos]

Cytoplasmic volume of recipient oocytes affects the nucleus reprogramming and the developmental competence of HMC buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos.

Generation of Cloned Calves from Different Types of Somatic Cells

Donor cell differentiation, reprogramming, and cloning efficiency: Elusive or illusive correlation?

Irregular transcriptome reprogramming probably causes thec developmental failure of embryos produced by interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer between the Przewalski’s gazelle and the bovine

Effects of Different Recipient Cytoplasm on Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer

Development of Porcine Embryos Reconstructed by Nuclear Transfer of Cultured Cumulus Cells into in Vitro Matured and Enucleated Oocytes.