Effects of Different Long-Term Fertilization and Crop Residue Management on Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields with Purple Soil

Jing XIONG,Dan-Qi ZHANG,Xiao-jun SHI,Jiu-Pai NI,De-Ti XIE,Zhi-jian MU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-5471.2013.05.020
2013-01-01
Abstract:To investigate the response of methane emissions to different long-term fertilization and crop residue management,a closed chamber technique has been used to measure methane fluxes from five experimental plots at the National Monitoring Base for Purple Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Efficiency during the rice-growing season in 2011.These plots have been subjected to different treatments since 1991,including no crop residue incorporation combined with no fertilization(R-),application of P and K fertilizers(PKR-),or application of N,P and K fertilizers(FnR-),and crop residue incorporation combined with no fertilization(R+) or application of N,P and K fertilizers(FnR+).The seasonal patterns of methane fluxes from different plots are similar but the emission rates are distinctly different between these plots.The cumulative emission of methane from the treatment R-is C 108 kg/hm2,which is a little lower than that from PKR-.The methane emission from FnR-is decreased by 31% to 44% when compared to R-and PKR-,indicating that the application of N fertilizer could inhibit methane emissions from purple paddy soils under the condition of no crop residue incorporation.In contrast,the methane emissions from R+ and FnR+ are not significantly different,but are 92% to 99% higher than that from R-and 176% to 186% higher than that from FnR-,suggesting that crop residue incorporation could stimulate methane emission and mitigate the inhibitory effect of N fertilization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?