Adaptive Changes of Hunter-Gatherers during the Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene Transition in China
CHEN Sheng-qian
2006-01-01
Abstract:Food production is recognized as one of the most significant events that marks the transition from the late Pleistocene to early Holocene.However,not all hunter-gatherers appeared to accept this subsistence strategy immediately.A previously published model(see Vol.25:42-55) predicted that forager strategies would be seen in the plant-dependents of South China and Southwest China,as well as the animal dependents of the northeast-southwest transitional zone,which has the highest hunting resources.In addition,collector strategies would be used by peoples who were dependent on plants in North and Central China,where food production emerged.This research compares the model with archaeological evidence,and explores the relationship between them.In addition,this paper also evaluates hunter-gatherer subsistence diversity of those who did not initially utilize food production at the end of late Pleistocene.Finally,I discuss possible mechanisms of adaptive changes of late Pleistocene-early Holocene hunter-gatherers in China.Comparison between Modeling and Archaeological EvidenceComparing the terrestrial model with the archaeological record,it is found that they almost perfectly coincide with each other(see Figure 1)when we exclude those fundamentally environmental constraints such as the subpolar bottleneck(ET=11.43)and the threshold of plant dependence(ET=12.75).All food production took place in the areas where the ET is between 12.75 and 15.25,and at which storage has been used.Most interesting,all early Neolithic cultures are distributed in the areas where population density is relatively lower,when only supported by terrestrial resources.When putting all known early Neolithic cultures and all known incipient Neolithic sites on the map,it is very surprising that there is no exception.The Incipient Neolithic sites are distributed in the two large areas of North and Central China,i.e.,the middle and lower Yangtze valley and circum-Bo Sea region.This is coincident with the centers of domestication origin: millet in the north and rice in the south.So far only one early Neolithic culture is found in the middle and lower Yangtze valley,but the incipient sites such as Xianrendong and Diaotonghuan have a long sequence extending from the incipient Neolithic to the late Neolithic,and they include some phases belonging to the early Neolithic.It is because of the limited materials and the lack of identifiable data that we cannot define an early Neolithic culture.It is possible though to find another early Neolithic culture in the middle and lower Yangtze valley.Close to the mouth of the Yangtze River,there is a middle Neolithic culture,called Hemudu,at which was found a large number of rice remains and complex architectural structures.It is still unknown if there is a third middle Neolithic culture.Archaeological records also suggest that the earliest evidence of food production in China is found in the ecotonal zones of North and Central China.With increasing sophistication of food production,the centers of domestication moved towards the fluvial plains(see Figure 2).However, owing to paleoenvironmental changes that led to the movement of the ecotonal zones,the early centers of diversification and intensification drifted northwards with the warming process since the Last Glacial Maximum.Diversity in Cultural Adaptive Patterns of Prehistoric Hunter-GatherersFood production was not the unique and the best adaptive choice to all hunter-gatherers during the transition from the terminate Pleistocene to Holocene,when environmental changes led to different niches for them.Prehistoric hunter-gatherers kept certain tension between food production and hunting-gathering subsistence.From the terrestrial model,we expect to see most hunter-gatherers are in Southwest China,then Inner Mongolia,then the two islands of Hainan and Taiwan, and then in some mountainous areas.This is also highly correspondent with ethnographic records.Today most of the minor nationalities of China are distributed in Southwest China and the two islands,and they still have some cultural remains of hunting and gathering.Probably,Inner Mongolia is an exception,since hunting and gathering were replaced by pastoralism in the second millennium BC.But Northeast China had hunter-gatherers for a long period,until the last century.This area lies outside the threshold of ET 12.75,and its northern part lies below the subpolar bottleneck(ET 11.43).This means that food production is generally not feasible in its early stage.Similarly,it is most unlikely to find early archaeological remains of food production in Northwest China and Tibet.More than that,most of Northwest China and Tibet,at least one third of the country,is uninhabitable for hunter-gatherers.The peopling of these lands is totally a phenomenon after the emergence of food production.Only with the aid of grains or domesticated animals could people migrate there and use the land.Very limited production in primary production could support a similarly limited secondary animal biomass,among which the scarce and fast-moving ungulates are beyond the reach of hunter-gatherers.The typical hunters can only survive along the transitional zone that extends from the northeast to the southwest.Archaeological discoveries indicate that there are definitively not early and late Upper Paleolithic sites in Northwest China and Tibet,except in their northern peripheries and the eastern fringe of Tibetan Plateau.Projected Causes and Mechanism of Hunter-Gatherer Adaptive Changes1.Initial conditions-Paleoenvironmental changes1)The rise of sea level When considering the influence on the eastern half of China,i.e.,North China,Central China and South China,from the rise of sea level,it is reasonable to see both animals and hunter-gatherers would have had to migrate westward along the same latitudes when the exposed shelves were inundated by sea transgression.Then they could stay in the habitats similar to the one being inundated.In North China,about half of the fluvial plains of North China were lost to the sea around(10000BP) so that the population density of hunter-gatherers would be easily doubled,even if there were no population growth.Although retreating population moved inland in waves,they would have stopped in front of the mountains,where they would not move any more because the mountains represent different habitats.The hunter-gatherers groups were like sand being depositing on beach,and they increased the population in the hillside zone.This is a kind of ecotone that had been used by populations of relatively high density.Similarly,sea transgression inundated the(350000km~2) continental shelf of the East China Sea.After the LGM the headward channel aggradation,resulting from sea level rise,could have reached as much as(1750km) above the present estuary,and have reached a height of 40 m above present sea level along the Yangtze River channel.At the boundary of the Pleistocene-Holocene,there are still no huge lakes in the middle and lower Yangtze River except those expanded by seasonal floods, which inundate more land than in the previous period.2)The influence of monsoon From a variety of climatic data,it suggests that the earliest appearance of a precipitation peak from the LGM is Southwest China ca.(12000BP),almost(3000) years before the East Asian monsoon maximum.The maximum precipitation/effective precipitation occurred ca.(12000)—(10000) years ago in Northeast China,ca.(10000)—(7000) years ago in North China,and ca.(8000)—(5000) years ago in the middle and lower valley of the Yangtze River.Contrary to the southward transgression in precipitation and effective moisture,the enhancement of East Asian summer monsoon continuously moves northward until ca.(6000BP),i.e.,the maximally northern limit,while the south limit of winter monsoon retreat.3)Vegetational changesAt(18000BP) of the LGM,most of China was cold and dry.Frozen steppes covered almost all of North China,and the southern limit of continuous permafrost in the east moved 11 degrees south.The vegetative change from(12000) to(9000BP) is abrupt and remarkable according to the pollen data.In particular,this challenge would occur in the boundary zones of vegetation.Hunter-gatherers probably had to practice a lifeway as 'niche chasers' in order to procure habitually used resources,and began to utilize the new resources.Vegetative replacement at the same time presents the opportunities to intensify some resources that have the greatest potential to increase production,i.e.,the wild predecessors of crops.4)Faunal extinctionThe total species of herbivore found in the Upper Paleolithic sites of North China(see Table 5.5),and find that 13 of 40 species disappeared,i.e.,a 32.5% extinct rate.There is possibly an abrupt increase of the extinction rate at the very end of the Pleistocene.From the archaeological records,these herbivores are commonly found in the EUP sites,but dramatically decrease in the LUP sites,especially in North China.The abrupt and rapid environmental change after the LGM may have been the last straw.The drastic reduction of large mammals in size and quantity,especially herbivores,is another initial condition to Holocene adaptations.5)The Younger DryasThe research from ice cores of Greenland suggests that some climate proxies associated with middle-latitude sources appear to have changed about 15 years before climate proxies associated with more northerly regions.The ice records show that the transition to the Younger Dryas occurred in a few decades,and that it took about(1500) years(from ca.(11700) to ca.(10200)BP)to reach the typical Holocene climate.Moreover,a near annually resolved,multi-parameter record from the cores of Summit,Greenland,indicates that most of the transition occurred in series of steps with the durations of only about 5 years.Therefore,the beginning date of the Younger Dryas is set at(11645)BP in higher latitudes and(11660BP) outside of the Arctic.This episode terminated as rapidly as it was initiated,in a 50-year period,so that the environmental changes that it led to,were abrupt,and undoubtedly significantly influenced the adaptation of hunter-gatherers.The lacustrine data from the Beijing area,where are located almost all incipient Neolithic sites of North China,suggests two short transitions toward a cold and dry climate,ca.(11600)—(11300) and ca.(10950)—(10480BP) respectively.The research at the joint zone between Northwest and North China also witnesses the Younger Dryas as a period of cooler dryer conditions marked by widespread aeolian deposition.6)SeasonalityThe increase of seasonality is seen between(12000) and(8000BP) in terms of the difference of summer-winter solar radiation relative to the present.In the LGM,one can expect the high-seasonality areas to move southward,but most of North China and the whole Central China are still in the scope of high-seasonality.In this sense,high seasonality is also a kind of initial condition for the origins of food production.2.Self-organizing evolution of cultural adaptive systemsFood production is not completely strange for some hunter-gatherers,but it could only originate among those,who used a collector-strategy.Durable tools,longterm settlements,storage facilities are generally required when hunter-gatherers specially depend on plant foods.The difference of adaptive strategies can explain why only some hunter-gatherers could begin food production,and others not.South China ever had the earliest marks of Neolithic period such as pottery,polished tools,but food production was not used until several thousand years later than Central China.This pause of evolution of cultural adaptive systems could be traced back to the rapid improvement of environmental conditions for hunting-gathering in the early Holocene.In the transitional zone of the Yan Shan-Great Wall,archaeological evidence suggests that hunter-gatherers came to use food production when environmental conditions permitted,and they turned back to be hunter-gatherers when the climate deteriorated.As a self-organizing cultural adaptive system,hunter-gatherers kept a certain tension between food production and food foraging.Conclusion and ImplicationIn sum,several conclusions can be made from this discussion:(1)Although food production definitely represents a progress of human adaptation in energy controlling,this does not mean that it is an exclusive subsistence choice when prehistoric hunter-gatherers confront with pressures from social and natural environments.Instead,they would select their own strategy between food production and hunting-gathering,in order to best adapt resource changes.This argument is supported by both modeling and archaeological evidence.(2)The emergence of food production requires some initial conditions of environments and cultural systems such as living in the area where effective temperature is below the threshold and using the collector strategy.As matter of fact,not every area has this kind of condition for hunter-gatherers who lived there.It probably could explain why food production only appeared in North China and the Yangtze Valley.(3)Undoubtedly,climate changes of the terminate Pleistocene urged the emergence of food production,but they only played in the role as one of initial conditions.Environmental changes cannot simply explain the adaptive change of prehistoric hunter-gatherers,since the correspondence between modeling and archaeological evidence,adaptive diversity of hunter-gatherers,and the uniquely emerging mechanism of food production,all rejects this simple argument.The coincidence of theoretical explanation and modeling prediction with the archaeological record has partly proven the significance of this research,and furthermore this research can guide future archaeological study.Most of all,it shows what archaeologists can expect in different cultural-ecological regions,and then allow us to put our limited funds and time into the most productive aspects.As Binford said,it would not be productive to prove that the earth is flat,and thus,a correct direction is needed for fruitful research.