ORGANISM-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS DURING THE PERMIAN-TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION AND ITS AFTERMATH
Zhong-Qiang Chen,Thomas J. Algeo,Margaret L. Fraiser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2012.p12-102r
2014-01-01
Palaios
Abstract:Multicellar life came closest to complete annihilation during the ca.252 Ma Permian–Triassic mass extinction (PTME), which resulted inthe largest crash in global biodiversity since the Cambrian explosion(Alroy et al., 2008). This largest biocrisis in the Phanerozoic has alsodramatically redirected the course of biotic evolution during theMesozoic and Cenozoic, and is responsible for much of the structure ofmarine and terrestrial ecosystems today (Chen and Benton, 2012).However, many aspects of the biotic recovery following the PTME havebeen puzzling, including its tempo and mechanism (Erwin, 1994, 2001;Benton and Twitchett, 2003). Growing evidence shows that stressedenvironments and multiple disaster events that further devastatedterrestrial and marine ecosystems during the Early Triassic may haveaccounted for the prolonged delay in biotic recovery following thePTME (Algeo et al., 2011).Three decades of paleontological effort have made late Permian toEarly Triassic marine ecosystems among the most thoroughly studiedfossil communities in Earth history (Chen and Benton, 2012). Changesin biodiversity of all fossil groups through this critical interval are wellknown today. Among the clades most severely affected were corals,brachiopods, foraminifera, radiolarians, bryozoans, echinoderms,gastropods, bivalves, and ammonoids (Erwin, 1994). Individual cladesexhibited dramatically different diversity changes during the crisis,however. For example, brachiopods were among the commonestanimals in Permian oceans but experienced a sharp decline in diversityduring the Early Triassic, and their diversity did not reboundsignificantly until the early Middle Triassic (Chen et al., 2005). Coralssuffered a major diversity loss in the PTME and did not reappear untilthe middle Anisian (Sepkoski, 1984). This is also true for radiolarians, aclade that suffered a large depletion in diversity during the EarlyTriassic and early Anisian (O’Dogherty et al., 2010). In contrast,ammonoid faunas underwent a rapid albeit punctuated diversityrebound in the Early Triassic, reaching a higher diversity by theSmithian than prior to the PTME (Brayard et al., 2009; Stanley, 2009).Foraminifera also show a strong recovery during the Early Triassic,passing their precrisis diversity by the Smithian (Song et al., 2011). ThePTME had a lesser effect on conodonts, which showed a stepwiseincrease in diversity throughout the Early Triassic (Orchard, 2007).Among echinoderms, crinoids disappeared for most of the EarlyTriassic and rebounded during the end-Spathian (Erwin, 2001), whileophiuroids experienced a diversity increase and geographic expansionimmediately after the PTME (Chen and McNamara, 2006). As a result,the recovery of some animal clades (e.g., ammonoids, foraminifera) andtrace fossils occurred during the Olenekian, i.e., within 2–3 myr of thePTME, whereas that of others was delayed by 5–10 myr, lasting untilthe late Anisian stage of the Middle Triassic (Chen and Benton, 2012).The tempo of biotic recovery in the Triassic remains disputed becauseof these differences among individual clades.Since its inception in 2008, the goal of IGCP Project 572 (with .130members worldwide) has been to document the rebuilding of marineecosystems following the PTME in different environmental settingsworldwide. The IGCP572 community published a thematic issue onPermian–Triassic ecosystems in 2011 (Algeo et al., 2011). The presentthematic issue follows up on this earlier work, focusing on organism-environment interactions during the biocrisis and the postextinctionrecovery. The overall goal of this thematic issue is to provide a betterunderstanding of the causes of the prolonged devastation of marineecosystems following the PTME and its significance in terms of thelong-term coevolution of life and the physical environment in the Earthsystem. The studies contributed to this special issue provide strati-graphic, sedimentologic, paleontological, paleoecologic, and geochem-ical insights from diverse locations around the world. In particular,these studies address the role of protracted environmental devastationon the recovery of Early Triassic marine ecosystems.Analysis of the PTME at a global scale depends heavily ondevelopment of detailed biozonation schemes that are based largelyon the fossil record of conodonts (Mei et al., 1998; Henderson and Mei,2007; Orchard, 2007). High-resolution biostratigraphic frameworkshave been developed for the Meishan GSSP (Yin et al., 2001; Jianget al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2009) as well as other sections in South China(e.g., Nicoll et al., 2002; Zhao et al., 2007; Metcalfe and Nicoll, 2007;Jiang et al., 2011) and globally (e.g., Perri and Farabegoli, 2003; Kozur,2004, 2005). In this volume, two studies contribute to this effort byproviding detailed analyses of conodont biostratigraphy through theuppermost Permian to Lower Triassic from sections in GuizhouProvince (Yan et al., 2013) and Hubei Province (Zhao et al., 2013). Thestudied sections represent two very different environmental settings.Yan et al. (2013) examine the flanks of the Permian–Triassic GreatBank of Guizhou, an isolated carbonate platform in the NanpanjiangBasin, southwest China. This isolated platform has yielded detailedbiotic and geochemical records that have provided insights into marineecosystem perturbations and climatic extremes during the PTME andits aftermath (Payne et al., 2004; Song et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2012).Zhao et al.’s (2013) fine conodont biostratigraphic study of LowerTriassic strata in the Three Gorges area helps not only to defineprecisely the PTB and Lower Triassic stages and their boundaries, butalso to detect a much thicker PTB succession than that of the MeishanGSSP. The Lower Triassic succession studied by Zhao et al. (2013) hasthe potential to yield high-resolution geochemical records of environ-mental and climatic change following the end-Permian crisis.The other studies of the present thematic issue offer additionalinsights regarding organic-environment interactions and protracted orrecurrent environmental stresses during the PTB interval and EarlyTriassic. The paper by Brookfield et al. (2013) explores environmentalchanges through the Permian–Triassic transition at Guryul Ravine,Kashmir, a classic PTB site that has received detailed sedimentologicand isotopic study in the past (Brookfield et al., 2003; Algeo et al.,2007). The authors present a new interpretation of this section as arecord of possible extreme storm and/or earthquake and tsunamideposits around the PTB. They propose that at least two largeearthquakes and several tsunamis coincided with and/or rapidlyfollowed the PTME, although it is unclear whether these events were