Bank Supervision: Prevent Crisis or Promote Development?
Shen Kunrong,Li Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2005.10.002
2005-01-01
Abstract:During the past thirty years, Crises, regulation and development have been the three characteristics of the world economy: bank crises rose in one country and fell in another, government supervision measures that aimed at preventing crises were shifting between tight and loose controls, and the effect of crises and supervision on banking, and even on the world economy, was more intricate than other factors. These three issues were studied respectively in the existing literature, but without considering the relationship between them: although detailed and profound, the analyses were made with different premises and served different purposes, and therefore, the conclusions made are more often than not completely different, making policy makers unable to decide which is right. We have chosen bank supervision as the starting point, used bank development as the ultimate goal indicator to gauge the integrative performance of the regulation, adopted the newest data (2004) of the findings report from the World Bank, constructed 12 bank regulatory indices with the principal component analysis, improved the traditional OLS model with the IV and GMM estimation, and thus tested and verified the effect of supervision measures, making an initial exploration of the best plan of bank control. On the basis of the study of transnational experiences, we have also investigated the status quo of the regulation of China's banks, and, by means of the introduction of the cross term into the basic econometric model, examined the supervisory scheme that China can adopt under the circumstances in which China's bank capital-asset ratio is low and non-official supervisory system is immature, and thus provided the foundation in policy for the bank's supervisory reforming after the founding of China Banking Regulatory Commission.